Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 15 replies
  • Subscribers 33 subscribers
  • Views 4282 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Shed Supply From Ring Main

PG
A small (7ftx5ft) shed is to be located at the rear of a house. There will be a 2ft gap between the shed and the rear of the house.
The shed is to be used as a utility room, initially, with a tumble drier and freezer It will also have a frost protection heater and lighting.  If we allow a bit of power for future or garden tool use then there could be a max demand of about 18A. There are no other services planned (no water, gas or drainage). The 230V supply is TN-C-S
The house has a lightly loaded RFC on the inside wall by the shed and the proposal is to break into the RFC and loop the RFC through the shed. The RFC is supplied from a Consumer Unit that is located near the front of the house..
Not exactly a standard arrangement, probably wouldn’t even consider it if the shed was a few more yards down the garden but I haven’t managed to locate a statement in the Wiring Regs that precludes this approach. I wouldn’t have thought twice about extending an RFC through a conservatory.
 I wondered if the Forum thought that 465.1 (Emergency Switching) could come into force, say for isolating the shed in the case of a fire but I suppose that the shed isn’t too different from another room?

Parents
  • 0
    Regs wise quite OK;  but one thing-  how permanent is the shed ? Some are like a battleship, others more flimsy.

    If there is a credible risk  that the shed may be removed again,it might be better as a spur or two that could also be more rapidly be isolated if the shed  roof leaked or something.


    Given the proposed loading you may sometimes want more than 13A, but the provision of 2 spurs or doing the full ring loop is almost the same, but  once the loop is hooked out it is harder to undo, and if it has to be done in a hurry, it may lead to a broken ring.

    Another  (but highly non standard) approach, and one that may therefore have a few folk sucking their teeth, could be a 4mm unfused spur from the 2.5mm ring- again the loading on the rest of the ring is the same as if you had extended the ring, but the outdoors  can be isolated more readily if there is a problem.

    M.
Reply
  • 0
    Regs wise quite OK;  but one thing-  how permanent is the shed ? Some are like a battleship, others more flimsy.

    If there is a credible risk  that the shed may be removed again,it might be better as a spur or two that could also be more rapidly be isolated if the shed  roof leaked or something.


    Given the proposed loading you may sometimes want more than 13A, but the provision of 2 spurs or doing the full ring loop is almost the same, but  once the loop is hooked out it is harder to undo, and if it has to be done in a hurry, it may lead to a broken ring.

    Another  (but highly non standard) approach, and one that may therefore have a few folk sucking their teeth, could be a 4mm unfused spur from the 2.5mm ring- again the loading on the rest of the ring is the same as if you had extended the ring, but the outdoors  can be isolated more readily if there is a problem.

    M.
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines