Sparkingchip:
The Onsite Guide puts it much more succinctly:
7.2.2 Socket-outlet circuits
As a rule of thumb for rings, unfused spur lengths should not exceed 1/8 the cable length from the spur to the furthest point of the ring.
So if the spur is adjacent to the DB, that gives 80 m to the furthest point and 160 m all the way round. That's a long ring!
In fact all may be well if the load is not great. Perhaps an FCU in the spur would help?
ETA: IMHO spurs should be avoided. We are not aiming to make a coronavirus! ?
Sparkingchip:
That fails the 1/8 rule of thumb design rule, there’s a few other potential issues as well.
If you look in the Commentary, you'll see where the 1/8 rule came from ... it's to do with loop impedance not "mis-loading" or anything else.
You can see that from my previous post.
Whether the socket-outlet is added on the ring itself or a spur won't affect the loading of the ring at all - but too many outlets or connection points or spurs at one point of course can do so, unless you know the loads will be small (e.g. concentration of outlets near a TV).
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site