This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

IEC 60364 Table 48A

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Does anyone know where I can find table 48A? I am reading of its existence, but don't know where to find it.
  • The table was called 48A in the older withdrawn versions of 60364-4-41 , then in 2001 it became
    Table 41C (48A) – Maximum disconnecting times in the then new  Electrical installations of buildings Part 4-41:

    in the 2005 version it became Table 41.1 – Maximum disconnection times
    As far as I know the numbers have not changed at all for years,
    EDIT apparently the numbers did change at some point, as did the underlying assumptions about how the touch voltage was likely to vary- see other posts below


    The figures in the UK regs are a direct copy without the bits for 120V land.


    89049e5216f57b156a8e1e2ec5e99247-original-41-1capture.png
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    mapj1:

    It was called 48A in the older withdrawn versions, then in 2001 it became
    Table 41C (48A) – Maximum disconnecting times in the then new  Electrical installations of buildings Part 4-41:

    in the 2005 version it became Table 41.1 – Maximum disconnection times

    As far as I know the numbers have not changed at all for years, and we are now in the 2017 edition.

    The figures in the UK regs are a direct copy without the bits for 120V land.


    89049e5216f57b156a8e1e2ec5e99247-original-41-1capture.png




    From what I gather, the disconnection times were faster in 48A for certain locations by a factor of half.

    d402d3cb71d69878be4d648eee764545-original-image-20210531094627-1.png


  • Interesting I was not aware of that. Then we/you  need to track down a pre 2000 version of the standard.


    Mike.

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    mapj1:

    Interesting I was not aware of that. Then we/you  need to track down a pre 2000 version of the standard.


    Mike.

     




    I can't find the 2000s version, at least not for free. Someone else will need to.


  • mapj1:

    It was called 48A in the older withdrawn versions of 60364-4-41 , then in 2001 it became
    Table 41C (48A) – Maximum disconnecting times in the then new  Electrical installations of buildings Part 4-41:

    in the 2005 version it became Table 41.1 – Maximum disconnection times

    As far as I know the numbers have not changed at all for years, and we are now in the 2017 edition.

    The figures in the UK regs are a direct copy without the bits for 120V land.


    89049e5216f57b156a8e1e2ec5e99247-original-41-1capture.png


    Hang on ... in 2001 edition, Table 41C (48A) is NOT an equivalent of what we have now in Table 41.1. It only applied in cases where the relevant part 7 (IEC 60364-7-7xx) reduced the maximum permissible touch voltage via equipotential bonding to 25 V AC or 60 V DC. See C|Lauses in 413.2 of the 2001 version.


    For TN systems under usual conditions, see Table 41A and 41B of that standard ... which became what we now have as Table 41.1.


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    gkenyon:
    mapj1:

    It was called 48A in the older withdrawn versions of 60364-4-41 , then in 2001 it became
    Table 41C (48A) – Maximum disconnecting times in the then new  Electrical installations of buildings Part 4-41:

    in the 2005 version it became Table 41.1 – Maximum disconnection times

    As far as I know the numbers have not changed at all for years, and we are now in the 2017 edition.

    The figures in the UK regs are a direct copy without the bits for 120V land.


    89049e5216f57b156a8e1e2ec5e99247-original-41-1capture.png


    Hang on ... in 2001 edition, Table 41C (48A) is NOT an equivalent of what we have now in Table 41.1. It only applied in cases where the relevant part 7 (IEC 60364-7-7xx) reduced the maximum permissible touch voltage via equipotential bonding to 25 V AC or 60 V DC. See C|Lauses in 413.2 of the 2001 version.


    For TN systems under usual conditions, see Table 41A and 41B of that standard ... which became what we now have as Table 41.1.







    Do you have a copy of the table?


    My understanding is that there is a 50 volt and a 25 volt touch limit based on the environment.


  • There is no limit to touch voltage in IEC 60364-4-41 for TN systems (as today)


    For TT systems, same disconnection times, but touch voltage limited to 50 V by equipotential bonding. This is not the same as today.


    The disconnection times in Table 41 A (TN systems) are AC only but otherwise as they are for TN systems today, way back to 1992 at least, perhaps before ... As below for the 1999 Ed for example:


    U0        Disconnection time (s)

    120           0.8

    230           0.4

    277           0.4

    400           0.2

    >400         0.1
  • Could I ask if there is an underlying reason you may be interested in this? I may be able to provide some further insight ... or dispel a rumour.
  • Hang on ... in 2001 edition, Table 41C (48A) is NOT an equivalent of what we have now in Table 41.1.


    My apologies - I do not have the  copies to compare here, and the notes implied it was the same.  (and given even the 1977  version is 100 CHF it will be some time before we do have all possible standards here, an up to date copy of a few of them is quite enough...) However, it is interesting to know where the figures come from, as there are clearly some assumptions hidden . I will edit my post to delete the implication that it is the same.

    Mike.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    gkenyon:

    There is no limit to touch voltage in IEC 60364-4-41 for TN systems (as today)


    For TT systems, same disconnection times, but touch voltage limited to 50 V by equipotential bonding. This is not the same as today.


    The disconnection times in Table 41 A (TN systems) are AC only but otherwise as they are for TN systems today, way back to 1992 at least, perhaps before ... As below for the 1999 Ed for example:


    U0        Disconnection time (s)

    120           0.8

    230           0.4

    277           0.4

    400           0.2

    >400         0.1




    So where are they getting wet locations from?