This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Single Point or Solid Bonding query on 20kv U/G supplies

Hi Guys

I'm reviewing a MV cable installation design proposal and I'd appreciate some advice, scenario as below...

New Building with new MV switchgear being fed from an existing Main MV switchroom within the same facility campus.

MV distribution system is 20KV and there are 2 new supplies (A&B) to be installed to the new building.

New building total load is around 12,900 KVA and each supply must be able to accept full load.

Upstream breakers in Main MV switchroom are 1250A and the Incoming breakers in the new building MV switchroom are 630A.

The route between switch rooms is fully ducted (with cable chambers) and the distance is around 460m.

The current cable design is for 3x1c 185 AWA cables per circuit with AWA bonded at both ends and a separate 1c x 150mm CPC.

Cables to be installed in trefoil within ducts.

Current design has the MV terminations bonded at both ends


My question is; is double ended bonding suitable for this length of run or would there be potential issues with high circulating currents?


Regards, Seansasta
Parents
  • at 50Hz, depending on how the singles are laid you will get perhaps (400A * 400m * geometry factor)  maybe 10 volts along the length of the armour - imagine unbolting one gland and measuring voltage across the open gap ( the rather unknown geometry factor means you could see  between  lowest maybe  5v   if you had the cores as  a tight and rotating trefoil, maybe as much as 20v if phase cables are widely spaced on ladder and form a large area air cored loop). Just imagine as a thought experiment, please  do not actually undo a live gland  !!!


    We know the resistance of the armour, and the parallel CPC path, and we can calculate the amps that will flow round the loop from that driving voltage. This tells you how much heat is lost in pushing current in an endless loop of armour.  Compare that to the expected loss in the cables from current times resistive voltage drop, and you can see what a fraction it is. You will also see why too thin metal gland plates can run hot from this loop current, as well as steel ones running hot from magnetic loss.

    To run cool the cross section of the metal between glands needs to match cable cross -section,  so a fairly chunky gland plate or tails are needed.

    The ratings for AWA trerfoils  in the annex of BS7671 are for the both ends solid bonded case. Moving to a single end bond and flying CPC allows you to up the core ratings a bit.
    this nexan data (see page 11 for example) also has the note  'solid bond' in the top row of cable layouts for the various ratings where this applies


    If you get stuck I am happy to help review/ check  sums when I have some free time. With  the caveat I'm as likely to make an error as anyone but the chances of both of us making the same one is reduced a bit.


    M.
    wiring matters article

    more background intro
Reply
  • at 50Hz, depending on how the singles are laid you will get perhaps (400A * 400m * geometry factor)  maybe 10 volts along the length of the armour - imagine unbolting one gland and measuring voltage across the open gap ( the rather unknown geometry factor means you could see  between  lowest maybe  5v   if you had the cores as  a tight and rotating trefoil, maybe as much as 20v if phase cables are widely spaced on ladder and form a large area air cored loop). Just imagine as a thought experiment, please  do not actually undo a live gland  !!!


    We know the resistance of the armour, and the parallel CPC path, and we can calculate the amps that will flow round the loop from that driving voltage. This tells you how much heat is lost in pushing current in an endless loop of armour.  Compare that to the expected loss in the cables from current times resistive voltage drop, and you can see what a fraction it is. You will also see why too thin metal gland plates can run hot from this loop current, as well as steel ones running hot from magnetic loss.

    To run cool the cross section of the metal between glands needs to match cable cross -section,  so a fairly chunky gland plate or tails are needed.

    The ratings for AWA trerfoils  in the annex of BS7671 are for the both ends solid bonded case. Moving to a single end bond and flying CPC allows you to up the core ratings a bit.
    this nexan data (see page 11 for example) also has the note  'solid bond' in the top row of cable layouts for the various ratings where this applies


    If you get stuck I am happy to help review/ check  sums when I have some free time. With  the caveat I'm as likely to make an error as anyone but the chances of both of us making the same one is reduced a bit.


    M.
    wiring matters article

    more background intro
Children
No Data