Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8 replies
  • Subscribers 34 subscribers
  • Views 727 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

201 series of regs , notification, and the term domestic

Alcomax
I know it is not clear cut. But where say a pub has live in accommodation and if they share the same metered supply, any notifiable works are subject to the dreaded part p**.


BS7671 has a series of regs ........201, sometimes, especially applying to "domestic" premises; like 421.1.201 .To my mind a pub a described above is commercial, but of course works on the wiring is subject to the P.


But if you have one DB in the clearly commercial part, supplying all final circuits in the building, I do not see some ......201's applying to say a replacement DB if it is not actually in the what P describes as a domestic dwelling. I except there is still notification requirement, as I have always understood it.




Parents
  • 0
    It is time PartP was ditched. There are lots of reasons, here are a few of my pet hates:


    Notifiable works are not within the competence of Local Authorities or their Building Inspectors.

    In most cases, they sub any inspections out to some other contractor, which is daft, as that contractor could fill out the paperwork for less money

    Nothing is ever done with the paperwork. So far none at all has been produced in the Grenfell inquiry as far as I have seen. No notifiable work at all over at least 15 years?

    Even when they have a notification, or give BR permission, they only want an EICR, which they don't understand.

    Unless you have notified you cannot get a BR completion certificate, even if there is no notifiable work.

    Has anyone got any others?


Reply
  • 0
    It is time PartP was ditched. There are lots of reasons, here are a few of my pet hates:


    Notifiable works are not within the competence of Local Authorities or their Building Inspectors.

    In most cases, they sub any inspections out to some other contractor, which is daft, as that contractor could fill out the paperwork for less money

    Nothing is ever done with the paperwork. So far none at all has been produced in the Grenfell inquiry as far as I have seen. No notifiable work at all over at least 15 years?

    Even when they have a notification, or give BR permission, they only want an EICR, which they don't understand.

    Unless you have notified you cannot get a BR completion certificate, even if there is no notifiable work.

    Has anyone got any others?


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines