This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Confusion over table 7.1(i) OSG

When I look at line 10 (B40 mcb on a 6/2.5 twin and earth,TNS system the max circuit length due to zs is given as 23m(no RCD).Yet when I calc R1 +R2 x 23m I get 10.49x23/1000 = 0.24 ohms.Add ze for TNS to this(0.8) gives 1.04 ohms,whilst table B6 gives a max zs of 0.88 ohms for a B40.Wondered where I,m going wrong.

                                                                     Regards,

                                                                                      Hz

                                                                     

 

 

Parents
  • And herein lies the rub, pick a few corner cases - slow MCB, low mains voltage, hot live cable, so higher resistance,  then wonder should the earth path also be hot - probably in T and E on its own, but not if the earth path is assisted by trunking, plumbing  or conduit perhaps, add a bit of rounding up or down, and you will get a whole slew of similar, but not identical answers.

    I'm aware of the 10% volt drop being pessimistic .but it compensates for my resistance figures not being ‘hot’ .

    You could plug the loop impedance meter in at the far end after you have built it of course but then its a bit late to change it if the numbers come up a bit short.

    The tables are good, so long as you realize that they apply only loosely to any specific  real case.

    In many ways the last digit is a bit fruit machine - especially when it gives apparently precise answers like 118m or something.


    Mike

     

Reply
  • And herein lies the rub, pick a few corner cases - slow MCB, low mains voltage, hot live cable, so higher resistance,  then wonder should the earth path also be hot - probably in T and E on its own, but not if the earth path is assisted by trunking, plumbing  or conduit perhaps, add a bit of rounding up or down, and you will get a whole slew of similar, but not identical answers.

    I'm aware of the 10% volt drop being pessimistic .but it compensates for my resistance figures not being ‘hot’ .

    You could plug the loop impedance meter in at the far end after you have built it of course but then its a bit late to change it if the numbers come up a bit short.

    The tables are good, so long as you realize that they apply only loosely to any specific  real case.

    In many ways the last digit is a bit fruit machine - especially when it gives apparently precise answers like 118m or something.


    Mike

     

Children
No Data