Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 23 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 2544 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Bonding

ARE

My house was rewired for me 20 years ago by an NICEIC registered firm of electricians. Concurrently a new BS7870PVC concentric cable was run down a pole on my land from overhead cables, then underground and finally up a hockey stick into a DNO head in a new external meter cabinet. Separately a 10mm cable from a new earth rod was run up an adjacent tube, to a MET in the same cabinet.  A conventional TT system, I presume. 

 

The (then) new internal CU (less than 2m from this cabinet) was fitted with 2 x 30ma RCDs between them feeding 14 circuits. One of these (protected by a 16a MCB) goes to a detached fuel store (copper tube connects a steel oil tank to the central heating boiler within the house). Another (also protected by a 16a MCB) goes to a detached now metal framed greenhouse and adjacent twin garage. Sub distribution boards in each outbuilding are fused down to 15a radials to every twin socket and to 5a for lighting. There is no EV charger yet. 

 

2.5mm 3core SWA cables connect the main CU to the sub distribution boards.

 

Does the armour in the SWA qualify as 10mm bonding ?

 

Should separate earth spikes be driven in, near the sub boards in each outbuilding?  If so, how should the (3 core) SWA best be terminated at origin (CU) and at each outbuilding?  

Parents
  • 0

    Indeed it does look like a TT installation now that we can see the images. I came across an installation in the middle of nowhere in the countryside that was TT earthed. The owner said that they could not have a P.M.E. earthing terminal because the overheads were too long and Ze was too high, so TT earthing had to be used. The image overheads are likely to be in an impoverished area or very rural neglected area, as they are bare and old. Upgrading required.

    Z.

Reply
  • 0

    Indeed it does look like a TT installation now that we can see the images. I came across an installation in the middle of nowhere in the countryside that was TT earthed. The owner said that they could not have a P.M.E. earthing terminal because the overheads were too long and Ze was too high, so TT earthing had to be used. The image overheads are likely to be in an impoverished area or very rural neglected area, as they are bare and old. Upgrading required.

    Z.

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines