This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EV Ultra Cable ( SWA 3 core with Cat 5). Termination ?

Looking at EV Ultra SWA 3 core cable with Cat 5 data and is raising a few questions.

It is aimed at EV charging installations, however…..

At some point that cable has to enter an enclosure and be terminated.  This could be directly into an EV charger, designed to take the cable, but it could also potentially be terminating at the power source end, into an enclosure with power terminations for the 3 cores ( line conductors and CPC ), e.g. a consumer unit.  

It just seems a bit iffy to have a data cable ( by now unsheathed and stripped back )  entering a consumer unit.  A data cable that has a conductive shield.

Is anyone aware of any regs that specifically allow or prevent this situation?  or is the case of  “allow” is that covered by section 134 and regs such as 134.1.1 “Good workmanship….proper materials……manufacturers' instructions.”  e.g. power elements and SWA terminated to CU with a gland, data cable suitably sheathed ( sleeved ) as it makes it's way back out of the CU to an appropriate ethernet connection?

Parents
  • mapj1: 
     

    Indeed - and ‘makers instructions’ if there are any, take precedence. 

    ‘taking account of manufacturer’s instructions' does not mean they take precedence over safety requirements.

    BS 7671 only requires certain specific things, like luminaires, busbar trunking systems, maintenance free accessories to BS 5733, and semi-enclosed fuse elements, to be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Everything else is “taking into account” or “taking account of” etc.

    Even then, what if manufacturer's instructions in a particular circumstance would contravene a safety requirement, or a provision in legislation in the UK because the instructions are developed in another country?

    On these points I definitely agree with points davezawadi has made in the past.

Reply
  • mapj1: 
     

    Indeed - and ‘makers instructions’ if there are any, take precedence. 

    ‘taking account of manufacturer’s instructions' does not mean they take precedence over safety requirements.

    BS 7671 only requires certain specific things, like luminaires, busbar trunking systems, maintenance free accessories to BS 5733, and semi-enclosed fuse elements, to be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Everything else is “taking into account” or “taking account of” etc.

    Even then, what if manufacturer's instructions in a particular circumstance would contravene a safety requirement, or a provision in legislation in the UK because the instructions are developed in another country?

    On these points I definitely agree with points davezawadi has made in the past.

Children
No Data