Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 13 replies
  • Subscribers 34 subscribers
  • Views 3075 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Smart relays on ring mains

vantech

Hi, 

I have installed plenty of these devices, as well as their dimmer range. 

https://shelly.cloud/products/shelly-1pm-smart-home-automation-relay/

What I am seeing however, is a number of people within online forums, installing these smart relays on ring mains. What they are doing is spurring from a ring, in 2.5mm and then switching this spur with the relay (without any form of fusing down, via means of an FCU). 

I do not believe this is compliant, for the following reason: 

  • The relay is rated at 16A, and although it has overload protection, this is electronic and if the contact welds, the overload would not be broken by the relay itself.

If installed after a 13A fused connection unit, the device is not only protected by a 13A fuse (less than the contact rating) it is also then seen as some sort of appliance. 

Is there anything else to add to this? 

Would anyone here actually install these relays in-line with a ring main and if so, why/how does this comply with BS7671? 

A few people have stated that the likes of Click Smart have a similar setup in a double socket: 

https://click-smart.com/products/mode-smart-sockets

However these are covered by a product standard and not BS7671, so the application is very different. 

Thoughts? 

Parents
  • 0

    I recently ordered a Shelley Pro 1 https://shelly.cloud/knowledge-base/devices/shelly-pro-1/

    for a museum installation and to my dismay discovered that the primary power with this new version module was mains in only not 12V dc earlier version.  I understand from the vendor that this product has UL and FCC  AU/NZ CE approvals. However, I would seriously question the safety of a product that is din rail mounted with a gap of barely 2mm between the metal conductors between the screw terminals. I would leave an air gap of at least 5mm for L-N separation.

    Note that I have informed the vendor of my opinion and will definitely not use this module in our current project.

    Thoughts, please?

     

  • 0 in reply to Electrode

    can you post a pic of the offending terminals on the new model ? It is non too clear from the weblink, and the risks for clearance (a free air gap) and creepage (the distance electricity would have to flow along the  wiggles of a surface if it was say damp or contaminated) are quite fifferent and depend on the details of the design.

    Oddly when this thread was first opened I did contact the suppliers technical folk, who were kind enough to reply by email from Bulgaria, but the response was not exactly unequivocal and as feared they were indeed a bit shaky on UK wiring practice.
    Mike.

  • 0 in reply to Electrode

    Hi, 

    I think there are many products on the market that have L&N side by side. Look at LED drivers for example.

    Can you elaborate more on your meaning? 

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Electrode

    Hi, 

    I think there are many products on the market that have L&N side by side. Look at LED drivers for example.

    Can you elaborate more on your meaning? 

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines