Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 87 replies
  • Helpful Answers 2 Helpful answers
  • Subscribers 43 subscribers
  • Views 18992 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Regulation stating a type AC RCD can not be upstream from a type A RCD

Alan B

Hi

I found an EV charger today with built in type A RCD + RDC-DD connected to a type AC RCD in the consumer unit, the AC RCD is also protecting 3 other circuits including sockets. I know this is incorrect because the type AC RCD could be blinded by DC currents, but I am struggling to find a regulation to reference when providing information to the customer?

Thanks

Alan

Parents
  • 0

    It's all very well arguing the technicalities, but that horse has bolted and the stable door is also well and truly bolted as well, so we are left in the position of having to comply with the new Wiring Regulations. 

  • 0 in reply to Sparkingchip

    Possibly Andy, but corrections are possible, although they can cause red faces! However I think it is important that the situation is fully understood by the industry, and the reasons need to be correct. We do tend to have a situation where IEC (or Cenelec or whatever) has suggested a regulation, but it is important to know exactly why and to be able to explain to customers why the item they bought last year is no longer satisfactory. If the reasons were as seems to be suggested, I think type As would not be suitable either as the alleged DC leakage current is in no way controlled, except by a potential fault resistance (its DC)!

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Sparkingchip

    Possibly Andy, but corrections are possible, although they can cause red faces! However I think it is important that the situation is fully understood by the industry, and the reasons need to be correct. We do tend to have a situation where IEC (or Cenelec or whatever) has suggested a regulation, but it is important to know exactly why and to be able to explain to customers why the item they bought last year is no longer satisfactory. If the reasons were as seems to be suggested, I think type As would not be suitable either as the alleged DC leakage current is in no way controlled, except by a potential fault resistance (its DC)!

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines