This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Like for like requirements

Hi, I know like for like replacement is classed as maintenance and a MEIWC isn't required. With an alteration to a circuit the new work has to comply with the latest BS7671, so some of the existing installation will need to comply also to allow the new work to comply, like RCD (if required), bonding, existing equipment rating and condition etc.

Am I right in thinking that for like for like this is not required? So if there was no bonding or RCD protection you could still change a light fitting for example.

What if there was no CPC at the light and you were fitting a class 1 or class 2 fitting? Or getting crazy, no CPC on a socket front change?

Thanks.

Parents
  • As I understand it, like for like is just classed as maintenance, it's not an alteration to an existing circuit, would you really pull the board apart to perform all the tests and test the bonding and main earth just to replace a pendant?

  • Absolutely you do, how else do you qualify and prove your work?

Reply
  • Absolutely you do, how else do you qualify and prove your work?

Children
  • In the case of a double insulated pendant with twin flex, I am not convinced that the work needs "proving" Even polarity is unimportant with a B22 lamp holder. 

    For an earthed pendant an earth loop test would be good practice, but little else.