This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Re: One month to go until BS 7671:2018+A1:2020 is withdrawn….act now!

I have just reveived an email from "IET Wiring Regulations".  In it, it says:-

Do you carry out inspections for landlords?

If you are performing electrical inspections for landlords of rented properties you must ensure that the installation is inspected against the most recent version of BS 7671. Staying up to date is imperative.

Am I wrong, or is that totally false?  Looking at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/312/regulation/2/made, it says:-

“electrical safety standards” means the standards for electrical installations in the eighteenth edition of the Wiring Regulations, published by the Institution of Engineering and Technology and the British Standards Institution as BS 7671: 2018(3);

So that is a specific version of the Wiring Regulations, and not the new 2020 one.

Parents
  • So if we have say Amendment X and that is valid from for use from date A and must be used from date B then from date A to date B we have (usually six months but has been 2 years) a period within which both versions can be said to be the current version?

  • Can be seen to be a current version of the regs, quite so. Nothing to stop more than one version of a standard being 'current' until one is withdrawn or deprecated.
    Mike.

  • So, in the overlap interval, an EICR (or EIC) could be conducted to either of the two current versions?

Reply
  • So, in the overlap interval, an EICR (or EIC) could be conducted to either of the two current versions?

Children
  • So, in the overlap interval, an EICR (or EIC) could be conducted to either of the two current versions?

    If the contract for the EICR is agreed a short time before the next version of the standard is published, the cut-over timescale would not be public knowledge. And if the EICR were to be carried out within a day or two of the newer version being published, the Inspector would not have had time to digest the changes for the new standard.

    It is therefore logical, and arguably cases where it is necessary, for there two be a period where two versions of a standard are considered to be 'current'.