This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Summary of Condition of Installation

"Detached 2 story property is approximately 30-40 years old and has PVC fixtures and fittings throughout. Separate from the property is a garage which was tested also. Some defects were found and these have been attended to by the Electrician"

The above comment was all that was inserted under the summary section of an EICR relating to a large property which also has a a swimming pool. Reason for report; property being sold.

Now I am not deriding the contractor as there is no encouragement on the template EICR in Appendix 6 to be more expansive. The space allocation for the summary is only a couple of lines. Even looking at the example given in the new GN3 on page 164, for a non-technical recipient, the comment made there could be filed under chocolate fire guards. 

Communicating a succinct, meaningful comment to a client can be difficult, even for those with wordsmith capabilities. Apart from conveying a summary, I have also noticed that many comments made are poorly constructed with grammar and spelling at a low level. For those reading the report who may have a more academic background but no technical understanding of electrical installations, it must call the quality of the whole report into question. It certainly does nothing for the esteem of the electrical installation industry! 

Perhaps the summary section should be dumped. It's either satisfactory or not and if not the comments can elucidate on why not!  

Parents
  • Very sad to read this "judgement". Bad spelling / grammar can be indicative of things other than a capability to do a job properly ... I needn't list the reasons here; it ought to be enough to say that Engineering and neurodiversity are often an excellent match.

    +1 for that. Clear logical thinking doesn't lead to an ability to use written English - simply because written English simply isn't logical - it's a mish-mash of rules from umpteen different original languages, corrupted over time as the language evolves, with no rules for deciding which rules to apply. Just consider the old example of "GHOTI" - pronounced like "FISH".

       - Andy.

Reply
  • Very sad to read this "judgement". Bad spelling / grammar can be indicative of things other than a capability to do a job properly ... I needn't list the reasons here; it ought to be enough to say that Engineering and neurodiversity are often an excellent match.

    +1 for that. Clear logical thinking doesn't lead to an ability to use written English - simply because written English simply isn't logical - it's a mish-mash of rules from umpteen different original languages, corrupted over time as the language evolves, with no rules for deciding which rules to apply. Just consider the old example of "GHOTI" - pronounced like "FISH".

       - Andy.

Children