This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Summary of Condition of Installation

"Detached 2 story property is approximately 30-40 years old and has PVC fixtures and fittings throughout. Separate from the property is a garage which was tested also. Some defects were found and these have been attended to by the Electrician"

The above comment was all that was inserted under the summary section of an EICR relating to a large property which also has a a swimming pool. Reason for report; property being sold.

Now I am not deriding the contractor as there is no encouragement on the template EICR in Appendix 6 to be more expansive. The space allocation for the summary is only a couple of lines. Even looking at the example given in the new GN3 on page 164, for a non-technical recipient, the comment made there could be filed under chocolate fire guards. 

Communicating a succinct, meaningful comment to a client can be difficult, even for those with wordsmith capabilities. Apart from conveying a summary, I have also noticed that many comments made are poorly constructed with grammar and spelling at a low level. For those reading the report who may have a more academic background but no technical understanding of electrical installations, it must call the quality of the whole report into question. It certainly does nothing for the esteem of the electrical installation industry! 

Perhaps the summary section should be dumped. It's either satisfactory or not and if not the comments can elucidate on why not!  

Parents
  • One of my English teachers at school said “if you are not sure if you can spell a word use a different one” which I sure lots of us were told to do.

    When you were handwriting or typing you could not review and correct having completed a rough draft, neither could you do a quick internet search to confirm your chosen words are appropriate, you would practice spelling the words on scrap paper and if needs be using a dictionary.

    I go into people’s homes on a daily basis, and they are not even using written words in any form to communicate or to complete transactions, they are merely holding a conversation with Alexa, their mobile phone or some other electronic gizmo.

  • they are merely holding a conversation with Alexa, their mobile phone or some other electronic gizmo.

    The interesting thing about this, is that the written form of language has undergone a number of changes over time. And it's still happening.

    However, it's been clear that, for 1000s of years (at least) the form of written language vs spoken language has been very different.

    A grasp of either the former or latter alone (without grasping the other) does not indicate an inability to communicate. And the inability to communicate in one of the forms in preference to the other is not, really, an indicator of intelligence.

    However, I'm clear that, in today's society, derision of someone who is adept at one of the forms of communication, and not the other, is, potentially, discrimination.

  • However, it's been clear that, for 1000s of years (at least) the form of written language vs spoken language has been very different.

    And (British) sign language is different again.

Reply
  • However, it's been clear that, for 1000s of years (at least) the form of written language vs spoken language has been very different.

    And (British) sign language is different again.

Children
  • Yes Chris, I have experienced various versions of sign language from disgruntled motorists. Most interesting. Many of them seem to indicate Victory or a single entity. I have yet to work out what the latter means.

    Z.