(I did mention that in an earlier reply, but it doesn't seem to show up most of the time)
Ah, fount it! Its seems there is an engx "article" (which looks very much like a normal forum thread) sat between here and the real article - so so after reading the main article and hitting the back button to get back here, I was actually in the engx "article" rather than here.
As the ENA have stated, the risk is very low.
Where did the Electrical Safety First get the figures of 40 people a year being injured by PEN faults? Where is this information and has it been verified?
Have you been reading a different article from me? ... or to put it another way, if there an interesting PEN faults article somewhere I've missed?
(I did mention that in an earlier reply, but it doesn't seem to show up most of the time)
Ah, fount it! Its seems there is an engx "article" (which looks very much like a normal forum thread) sat between here and the real article - so so after reading the main article and hitting the back button to get back here, I was actually in the engx "article" rather than here.
As the ENA have stated, the risk is very low.
Where did the Electrical Safety First get the figures of 40 people a year being injured by PEN faults? Where is this information and has it been verified?
Have you been reading a different article from me? ... or to put it another way, if there an interesting PEN faults article somewhere I've missed?
