Cable size of tails supplying a CU

I have a temporary CU board setup for rewires etc. (CU, isolator, 25mm tails, earth block, socket outlets) that I want to make smaller (and also want to know theses answers anyway).

If I made a new temporary CU board setup with a mains isolator to 4mm T&E tails, to single module 32A RCBO, to 4mm T&E final circuit cable, to a socket outlet or two, do you think the 4mm tails would be compliant?

Overload protection - The 4mm tails (and reduction in CCC) are protected from overload by the 32A RCBO and design current of 32A of the socket circuit.

Fault protection - Lets say most common main fuse in domestic is 100A (worst case) BS 1361 / BS 88-3 which has a max Zs of 0.27 ohms to achieve a 5 second disconnection time for a distribution circuit on a TN system (0.14 ohms for 0.4 seconds). So if the Zs is <0.27 it's OK.

Main (tails) earth size would need to be the same as the line conductor (4mm) to comply with table 54.7.

Or use the adiabatic equation (amusing a Zs of less than 0.27 ohms):

S =
√ I2 x t
/ k

Where:

Zs = 0.27 ohms
I (fault current) = 851A (230 / 0.27)
t = 1s (850A on BS 88-3 time current graph)
k = 115 (70* thermoplastic) or 143 if separate cable

√ 851 x 851 x 1 = 851
851 / 115 = 7.4mm2
or 851 / 143 = 5.9mm2 (if separate cable)

So 4mm supply tails with 4mm earth using table 54.7 would be adequate? Am I missing anything? Thanks.

Parents
  • you will need to think how you get the 4mm T and E into the meter tails without having a short length of single insulated exposed  somewhere, though in practice it is not a great risk. The  thinking in terms of Zs and ADS is OK, your adiabatic calc suggests the cable may be cooked during a fault, though a fault will probably involve cable replacement anyway.  This works as long as your new 'tail' is not long enough to actually affect the PSSC. Id be aiming for an in-line box andd smaller fuse or MCB if it was more than a few metres.  Personally I might have used flexible rubber type  cable rather than TnE for this, as the whole set up is always going to be on the move.

    It may raise a few eyebrows, but I cannot see any technical objection to the idea.

    Mike,

Reply
  • you will need to think how you get the 4mm T and E into the meter tails without having a short length of single insulated exposed  somewhere, though in practice it is not a great risk. The  thinking in terms of Zs and ADS is OK, your adiabatic calc suggests the cable may be cooked during a fault, though a fault will probably involve cable replacement anyway.  This works as long as your new 'tail' is not long enough to actually affect the PSSC. Id be aiming for an in-line box andd smaller fuse or MCB if it was more than a few metres.  Personally I might have used flexible rubber type  cable rather than TnE for this, as the whole set up is always going to be on the move.

    It may raise a few eyebrows, but I cannot see any technical objection to the idea.

    Mike,

Children