Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Helpful Answer
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 33 subscribers
  • Views 1526 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in

Ferromagnetic Enclosure

Mark Fleming

Hi All,

We came across this on a site last week and would be grateful for some clarification.

The panel board is supplied via single core double insulated 150mm conductors. As the picture shows, the cables enter through separate stuffing glands, but on closer inspection, the piece of metal in the centre has been slotted out so to be separate to the panel board itself.

As I have never seen it done this way before, could anyone confirm if this is compliant with 521.5.1 or if this could still cause an issue?

Regards

Mark

Parents
  • +1

    No issue provided the IP rating is preserved and the integrity of the DD has not been compromised. It is either that or cut a bigger aperture in the DB and fit an aluminium gland plate.

    JP

  • +1 in reply to John Peckham

    This sort of thing can reduce magnetic hysteresis losses in the steel, by increasing the magnetic path length around any one core, encouraging the current  to flow round the bundle instead. Topologically instead of multiple isolated holes you now have one, albeit an odd multi- dog-bone shape.

    In must be said that in thin sheet steel it is rarely necessary as the magnetic heating is not that much, but as the magnetic properties of knock out box steel are not very well defined, the regs suggest you do not put flow and return currents through separate holes, and this slitting is one way to achieve that.

    To recover the IP rating, it is possible to fill or cover the slots with another metal or indeed any material that is non-magnetic, brass braze or hard solder is one approach, but in less critical situations, filling the slots with glass-fibre, or epoxy resin or even mastic, is fine electromagnetically.  Mechanically that last one may not make the grade ;-)

    Mike

Reply
  • +1 in reply to John Peckham

    This sort of thing can reduce magnetic hysteresis losses in the steel, by increasing the magnetic path length around any one core, encouraging the current  to flow round the bundle instead. Topologically instead of multiple isolated holes you now have one, albeit an odd multi- dog-bone shape.

    In must be said that in thin sheet steel it is rarely necessary as the magnetic heating is not that much, but as the magnetic properties of knock out box steel are not very well defined, the regs suggest you do not put flow and return currents through separate holes, and this slitting is one way to achieve that.

    To recover the IP rating, it is possible to fill or cover the slots with another metal or indeed any material that is non-magnetic, brass braze or hard solder is one approach, but in less critical situations, filling the slots with glass-fibre, or epoxy resin or even mastic, is fine electromagnetically.  Mechanically that last one may not make the grade ;-)

    Mike

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines