Interesting - the EarthSure version seems to have a G/Y covered c.p.c. but is still the same overall size as normal T&E with a bare c.p.c., due to a having a thinner sheath of improved material. Doesn't comply with BS 6004, but  they seem to have negotiated BASEC approval.

I think the Irish already have T&E with an insulated c.p.c. (and possibly a full size c.p.c. as well) - which is presumably to suitable IS - and therefore likely to be directly acceptable to BS 7671 under the 'appropriate standard of another country' clause.

   - Andy.

AJJewsbury said:

I think the Irish already have T&E with an insulated c.p.c. (and possibly a full size c.p.c. as well) - which is presumably to suitable IS - and therefore likely to be directly acceptable to BS 7671 under the 'appropriate standard of another country' clause.

That's a possible route for conformity with BS 7671, as long as there's a constructional standard that meets the requirements of Reg Group 511 in not leading to a "declaration" or "departure", but it not being a UK national standard it's likely no data would be included in Appendix 4 for that cable type (if indeed it were different tables to BS 6004).

https://www.idh.ie/oldwebsite/quality-approved-cables/fumeguard-low-smoke-zero-halogen-cables/new-features-201b.html

The Irish stuff has BASEC approval, and as such would be OK here without further testing.

Note that the one illustrated is polythene, so less of a poisonous smoke risk than vinyl - no hydrochloric acid gas created - just sooty smoke and  a smell like rather a lot of candle wax.

Mike

AJJewsbury said:

Interesting - the EarthSure version seems to have a G/Y covered c.p.c. but is still the same overall size as normal T&E with a bare c.p.c., due to a having a thinner sheath of improved material. Doesn't comply with BS 6004, but  they seem to have negotiated BASEC approval.

Dose this put it in the ‘deviations’ box

Martyn said:

Dose this put it in the ‘deviations’ box

Not if there's a national standard from another country (based on IEC standards), that's a constructional standard.

Dose this put it in the ‘deviations’ box

I'm guessing it does - AFAIK nowhere else has a standard for T&E with a reduced c.p.c. that's "identified" with a G/Y covering that doesn't quite make it as insulation (the Irish one I suspect has full sized c.p.c.s and proper insulation).

I'm guessing BASEC approval doesn't make up for the lack of a construction standard as far as BS 7671 certification is concerned? Though probably takes the sting out of the paperwork if BASEC have already shown that it's "provides at least the same degree of safety".

  - Andy.

Dose this put it in the ‘deviations’ box

I'm guessing it does - AFAIK nowhere else has a standard for T&E with a reduced c.p.c. that's "identified" with a G/Y covering that doesn't quite make it as insulation (the Irish one I suspect has full sized c.p.c.s and proper insulation).

I'm guessing BASEC approval doesn't make up for the lack of a construction standard as far as BS 7671 certification is concerned? Though probably takes the sting out of the paperwork if BASEC have already shown that it's "provides at least the same degree of safety".

  - Andy.