Multiple AFDD’s tripping.

Hi all, I wonder if anyone can shed some light on an arc-fault-finding issue?

Installation details:

Large domestic property with a 42-way DB, a large Loxone (home automation) panel with it’s own 24V battery backup. Uniti Power Usymphony SPY300 provides UPS for two circuits (WI-FI & Medical equipment). Install with no issues since May 2023. A Riello SDH 3000 Sentinel Dual 3000VA is providing UPS to a home lift circuit that was added over a month ago.

Eleven Contactum 32A AFDDs are installed on all socket outlet circuits. RCBO’s on all other circuits

The property is located close to a small/medium-sized retail park.

The Problem:

The homeowner called on Monday this week to say that the kitchen electrics had tripped out. She then followed up with messages to say that the annexe kitchen had tripped, then the loft and then the bedroom sockets. All had tripped when appliances were operated. Sometimes a washing machine, toaster, kettle hover, etc. In all, four AFDD circuits tripping randomly.

Fault finding:

The kitchen AFDD stays up, but when I put on the kettle and the toaster the AFDD trips. If the fridge and toaster are on, the AFDD trips.  With the UPS systems removed, it still happens.

I removed both UPS systems before testing.

I tested the kitchen circuit; it was solid, with no issues. Earth leakage at the incomer was 23.55mA; on the kitchen circuit, it was 3.4mA with appliances on standby. I tested all the kitchen appliances under load, and the total leakage was approximately 3 mA. I ramp-tested the AFDD—23mA. I moved the appliances around the property and could see that they were not the problem. So, it was definitely an arc issue. Also, the LED status indicated an arc trip. Continuity tests confirmed no loose connections.

With all other circuits off. I cannot get the kitchen AFDD to trip.

Cause:

I spoke with Contactum technical, who were really helpful, but we couldn’t determine what was tripping the arc device.  Spoke to the NICEIC – they could not provide any support.

The fact that it has been in place for over a year with no issue, could it be a quality of supply issue from Nathoin Gird? The property has had a number of mini power cuts in the past – hence the UPS going in.

Any suggestions?

 

Thanks in advance. :-)

Parents
  • if I had discretion and spare money to spend on fire safety in a HMO, it wouldn’t be on AFDDs. However, tempting as it might be, I think you would be foolish to omit the devices and cite the omission as a deviation. 
    Imagine wakening up one morning to news that the HMO suffered a fire which the fire brigade watch commander in attendance thinks was caused by an electrical fault. Whether the cause was or was not electrical or whether or not an AFDD would have made the slightest difference would be of no matter should the local press get wind of the fact that the electrical installation recently installed by AMK was not compliant with the wiring regulations. Nuances do not get a fair hearing in the public domain and your reputation in the local community would be in tatters.

    The electrical equivalent of big Pharma have got us nailed by our own fears and the invidious nature of 421.1.7. 
    Fight back has to be by dumping the malfunctioning issues squarely back on them. As more of us suffer the problems highlighted by Stuff, perhaps by standing together, we might have a chance in removing the burden on caring, considerate, individual contractors.

Reply
  • if I had discretion and spare money to spend on fire safety in a HMO, it wouldn’t be on AFDDs. However, tempting as it might be, I think you would be foolish to omit the devices and cite the omission as a deviation. 
    Imagine wakening up one morning to news that the HMO suffered a fire which the fire brigade watch commander in attendance thinks was caused by an electrical fault. Whether the cause was or was not electrical or whether or not an AFDD would have made the slightest difference would be of no matter should the local press get wind of the fact that the electrical installation recently installed by AMK was not compliant with the wiring regulations. Nuances do not get a fair hearing in the public domain and your reputation in the local community would be in tatters.

    The electrical equivalent of big Pharma have got us nailed by our own fears and the invidious nature of 421.1.7. 
    Fight back has to be by dumping the malfunctioning issues squarely back on them. As more of us suffer the problems highlighted by Stuff, perhaps by standing together, we might have a chance in removing the burden on caring, considerate, individual contractors.

Children
  • I think the caveat here is that the consumer REQUIRES a BS EN 62606 compliant fault to meet with their AFDD's operating metrics.That alone should give plenty of rise for concern.

    The test standard requirements are interesting insomuch that they actually require the presence of carbon to simulate damage. If the fault has to develop to such a point whereby burning is, or has already been present, then surely it's too late even if the AFDD actually trips.

    Should the scenario you describe above whereby the omission of devices contributes to a fire, I would be calling a very expert witness to give the actual reasons why. I suspect that they would flounder in the witness box at this first hurdle.