Don246 said:

The OSG mentions that the max length for a radial on a 32A CB is 43m with an assumed load of 26A.

I can confirm that the length in Table 7.1(ii) in the OSG is based on the shortest length given by calculating for:

• EFLI (Tables 41.2 to 41.5 as appropriate)
• Voltage drop for the assumed load
• Where fuses are used, adiabatic (where overcurrent protection is provided by mcb or RCBO, then let-through energy for a cross-section of typical devices on the market is addressed - hence the 'NPad' under Types C and D)

Don246 said:

Anyone able explain how 75 m² in fig 15B has been worked out, surely there should be a not stating what length cable its equivalent to.

There is no longer an actual floor area served "limit". The floor area recommendation is based on average usage of power per floor area in typical situations. Note that older data is likely not relevant to a modern dwelling (or perhaps even office block).

Regarding the length of run for the floor area, this typically depends on a number of factors. If you think about it, to "serve" an area the shape of a rectangle, you would typically need to run along 2 walls (perhaps 3 if the dimensions are above 4 m on the shortest side). To calculate a rough length of cable for the 75 sq m, the table below shows cable length required for 2 sides of a rectangle with area 75 sq m with sides a and b (in m):

Of course, there are no 'vertical runs' in the above, but it does show that provided the rectangle has one side of at least 2 to 3 m, there is enough cable length with 43 m for some vertical runs as well as horizontal runs. If the floor is raised, permitting you to wire under-floor, you might have more possibilities.

So the conclusions are:

(a) Floor area served has nothing directly to do with cable length, because the length of run required to serve the area depends on the shape of the perimeter (unless you can wire under-floor to floor boxes).

(b) It's possible to serve 75 sq mm with 43 m of 4.0/1.5 cable, BUT it depends on the shape of the perimeter of the area served (and whether you can use floor boxes in a raised floor).

Agree with your comment regarding floor area, it's a shame they haven't made a note to clarify it in that figure.

Is it fair to say that VD determines the length of a circuit and changing the load on that circuit could have a significant impact on its length?

I recalculated using a fixed 10A load and manged to get the VD below 5% with length of 104 meters on a 4 sq mm.

(vd x 1000) / ((mv/m/a) x lb) = L

(11.5 × 1000) / (11 x 10) = 104m

so if the CB was changed to a type B 10A the length of the circuit could be increased as long as Zs was achived.

What would the assumed load be for a single socket outlet?

is there a formula to allow for overload current?

Don246 said:

so if the CB was changed to a type B 10A the length of the circuit could be increased as long as Zs was achived.

To achieve Zs, you could use an RCD (or RCBO), then the Zs target is Table 41.5 (not Tables 41.2 to 41.4) ... in which case volt-drop is usually the limiting factor.

Don246 said:

What would the assumed load be for a single socket outlet?

13 A, or, if you assume an unfused adaptor might be used, 20 A.

This illustrates a good (and related) point, though ...

Assume I have a house in which I decide to have 20 circuits for individual socket-outlets, rather than two circuits with 10 socket-outlets each. I would need to apply the same type of rule for each circuit (I don't know which, if any, circuit might be overloaded). So, the demand for each individual circuit will be 13 A or 20 A (per above), BUT would the maximum demand of the property be any different ... probably not, which is how the industry got to using Wm^-2 as a benchmark for overall demand.

It also shows that you can't determine maximum demand by adding up the ratings of individual circuits.

Don246 said:

so if the CB was changed to a type B 10A the length of the circuit could be increased as long as Zs was achived.

To achieve Zs, you could use an RCD (or RCBO), then the Zs target is Table 41.5 (not Tables 41.2 to 41.4) ... in which case volt-drop is usually the limiting factor.

Don246 said:

What would the assumed load be for a single socket outlet?

13 A, or, if you assume an unfused adaptor might be used, 20 A.

This illustrates a good (and related) point, though ...

Assume I have a house in which I decide to have 20 circuits for individual socket-outlets, rather than two circuits with 10 socket-outlets each. I would need to apply the same type of rule for each circuit (I don't know which, if any, circuit might be overloaded). So, the demand for each individual circuit will be 13 A or 20 A (per above), BUT would the maximum demand of the property be any different ... probably not, which is how the industry got to using Wm^-2 as a benchmark for overall demand.

It also shows that you can't determine maximum demand by adding up the ratings of individual circuits.