Why is the accuracy of multifunction testers so low

I am working on a scenario at the moment where my customer has an EV charger cutting out due to low and also possibly high voltage.
My KT65DL is indicating voltage as low as 214V and seeing swigs from 214 to 246 in a 1 hour period. The DNO are saying they don't trust the values being given and are declining to put a voltage logger in, asking for data from the EVCP manufacturer, which is unlikely to be available as it's Tesla and probably no more accurate.

But it's accuracy is +/- 2% plus 4 digits, so effectively +/-5V, which means it has very little value for checking the supply voltage is in range, also doesn't help that the sampling is quite slow and I assume minimums are being missed.

To my knowledge it's not that expensive to build reasonably accurate voltage meters, maybe AC meters cost more? But given multifunction testers cost £500 or more why is the accuracy so low?

  • If you really are seeing swing of 40V, and there is not 100A of load being keyed on and off at the house between the two states, then there are a number of possible nasty things happening - but some we can eliminate with a bit of local knowledge.
    If you need more evidence to get the DNO out of bed, then perhaps look if there is any evidence for  some of these issues.

    (and while one may argue the toss about the absolute meter accuracy,  a swing of that magnitude is really notable, even if both voltages would read higher or lower on a better instrument.) An L-N PSSC test may be revealing - have you done that ? Is this a 3 phase supply - I presume not but if it is, then looking at the other phases may  be instructive.


    Voltage drop at the transformer - this should be no more than about 5% if the substation or transformer is not horribly overloaded, but it could be,  or there may be a burnt  contact on one of the LV side fuses.

    Pole transformers where the paint has burnt off, or the oil has dripped are getting rarer, but are still seen occasionally and are a clear overload marker.

    Voltage drop on the line from transformer to the house - is the house at the end of a long thin street with the tranformer at the other end, and what loads (houses or businesses) does it share with.  (sharing such a supply with a welding shop can be bouncy, or somewhere with big loads like kilns or industrial ovens)

    Normally the DNO network designs for no more than about 10% voltage drop. But then the loads sort of grow...

    poor network neutral - prohibited by law, but not so uncommon in older aluminium clad buried mains. Varying N-E voltages and large currents in bonded services like water mains and things are a symptom.

    Faulty cut out or cut out fuse - smell of burning, dripping tar or plastic.

    then the only one that is not a DNO issue,


    Fault on load side - loose contacts scratchy main switch etc, all likely to be obvious by the heat produced, and the fact the house lights dim when the kettle goes on...
    test the volts  as near origin as is sensible.

    Mike

  • the house lights dim when the kettle goes on..

    maybe a bit less diagnostic these days than it used to be - as filament lamps are replaced by electronically driven LEDs or CFLs.

    A high current loop test can sometimes be revealing too.

       - Andy.

  • Thanks for all the input.

    On meter accuracy the KT65DL measures voltage to  4 digits, example 230.5, so my max error is 4.6V + 0.4V, total 5V.

    Interesting to see that the meter linked above is much less accurate for AC voltages than DC, I guess it's difficult to compensate for voltage drops across diodes, assuming meters use a bridge rectifier.

    Meter appears to be more accurate than that in real life, the error becomes a concern when we are on edge of acceptable, if I am seeing 216V, is it actually 216 or 214 for example.
    So the voltage variations I was seeing were occurring around about 5.30 in the evening. It's in a village that is fairly long and strung out, with a mixture of overhead and underground lines. Looking at the SSEN network map, the substation is about 4km away, marked as 33/11KV, which I assume is input and output. Also states fully constrained by thermal on the 33KV input line, no constraint down stream. There is also a solar farm covering a few hectares presumably on that substation. Looks like the substation can take a 50% reverse feed.
    I think the transformer for the village is about 1km away and the house in question is close to the end of line; with a couple of houses another 0.5 km outside the village, may be on a different feed. Main part of the village is spread out over about 1Km. Haven't managed to find a diagram of the local network

    Customer thinks he has actually solved his charging issues with a new 12V battery in the car, but he was reporting issues with both cars, so not sure. I am also seeing quite big swings in my house, 5 or 6 houses down from them. Now looking at this out of interest as much as anything else and wondering if there is actually a bit of an issue with the neutral. I am going to take some measurements of neutral voltage over the weekend to see what I get, will use a different meter as the KT65DL doesn't measure voltages below 25V.



  • I shall put my money on a network problem rather than a metering one.

    That said, I fully appreciate GK's comment about the type of meter which is required. The DNOs must have them.

    The real question must be where the burden of proof lies. Does a customer have to show that a supply is problematic, or does the DNO have to show that it is sound? At first glance, ESQCR 2002 is unhelpful.

  • when you measure NE, do so between supply N relative to a test electrode in the garden - which could be as simple as a garden fork and a  croc clip or some random old (non insulated of course) screwdriver  or similar for voltage readings - its not an electrode to carry massive fault currents after all. Measuring NE between network N and E tells you very little if there is any PME type wiring on the network it tends to hide such problems, as CPC and N then move together. True terra-firma earth does not move and then the full Neutral voltage lift is evident..
    I'd be slightly surprised if you are more than 500m from your 11kV to LV transformer, but occasionally it happens.  The location of the 33kV 11KV step-down means your 11kV line is about 5km long, which is long but not very long for an 11kV line.

    The one metre per volt rule for economic line length is a rule of thumb, not hard and fast but it is a good start as to what sort of distances to expect or consider 'unusually long'.

    Mike.

  • Just managed to get hold of the local supply network diagram. As you described it looks like there is actually a lot of 11KV cables going around the village, with what looks like small pole mounted transformers dotted all over the place. Probably no more than 150m from a transformer to any house.
    But I assume that the pole mounted or small ground mounted transformers are fixed ratio without any other technology. Therefore voltage drop in the 11KV network could still be an issue.

    I will be measuring earth/neutral voltage reference to something conductive stuck in the ground.

    I learnt quite a bit this evening digging around in diagrams etc, not sure how much use it will be day to day but interesting anyway.

  • well poor joints and voltage drop on the 11kV side has an effect of course, but because of the lovely way transformers change voltage and current in inverse ratio, you find you need a lot of ohms on the 11kV side to introduce the same effect as a resistance on the 400V side - well (11000/400) squared as many ohms to be precise (*)- so half an ohm on the LV side is more like a few hundred  ohms on the 11kV side, which is why one can afford HV lines of many km of course, and why there have to be quite so many LV transformers.

    So I'd expect an LV  fault first.

    Mike

    * and I was deliberately vague about are we comparing at voltage drops phase to phase or phase to neutral, as I know that the transformers are delta primary on the 11kV  and star wired 240V phase to neutral so perhaps  you may want to consider (11000/230) squared instead. In any case, it  is common to ignore the drops on the HV side, as a first approximation, and the smoothing effect of many loads pm the same 11kV branch mean that steps due to any given load are less serious.

  • Interesting to see that the meter linked above is much less accurate for AC voltages than DC, I guess it's difficult to compensate for voltage drops across diodes, assuming meters use a bridge rectifier.

    I suspect it's more about, unless it filters for 50Hz, the impact of the actual waveshape. It doesn't look to me as if MFTs filter 50Hz, but I may be wrong, but if they don't then the actual waveshape - which by the time you get to the property is vanishingly unlikely to be a pure sine wave - will have a big effect on the accuracy. Even with the regs on switch mode convertors (including car chargers) there is a huge amount of rubbish on domestic 50Hz circuits these days. (Even more in industrial circuits.)

    I wouldn't expect a modern (in the last 30 years!) professional meter to use diodes, I'd expect it to calculate the rms voltage from the waveshape - although many will use the average of each half cycle.

    However re the comments of "it actually seems to be more accurate than that", yes very probably - in fact I'd be worried if it wasn't. 4% is the point at which you could complain to the manufacturers that it hasn't met their spec, they'd have designed it to stay well within that so they don't get loads of returns. And as Graham suggests, they have to allow for, particularly, temperature extremes which throw both the voltage reference and the components in the analogue front end. It would be nice if they quoted accuracy between, say, 10C and 30C as well as over the full temp spec of the meter, but that won't sell many more meters to do so!

    Thanks,

    Andy

  • Several years ago I posted a discussion about the specifications of Megger multi function testers around the world.

     Megger MFT testers from around the world. Identify the countries by their functions. 

    The Americans have a very different approach to electrical installation testing than we do here in the UK.

    Here in the UK if you buy a Fluke EV installers test kit you get a Fluke MFT and a EV socket testing adapter.



    https://www.fluke.com/en-gb/product/electrical-testing/installation-testers/fev300-1664-kit

    The kit is not the same in America, you get the EV socket testing adapter, a electronics multi meter and a scope meter.


    https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/electrical-testing/installation-testers/emobility-kit-125b

    I am not someone who uses a scope-meter, I presume that using a scope-meter it’s possible to record the peak voltages as well the RMS voltage, but as the Open PEN protection is also measuring the RMS voltage (that is what it says in BS7671) we don’t need to know the peak voltage?

    matt-e.co.uk/.../

  • Twenty years ago when I was going to my first installation tester I asked for advice from Paul the then Head of Electrical Department at Kidderminster College, analogue testers were still readily available as sets of testers, but I bought a state of the art Robin KTS160 digital multifunction tester.

    Paul said to me that older electricians found it hard to interpret the test results from digital meters, because they were used to measuring with analogue meters. The older electricians would turn the analogue meter on, zero the needle as required, then press the button, the needle would ping up and wobble about a bit, they would look at it and go “Yeah, that’s okay” and that was it done. But with a digital meter they have a snap shot in time with a test result to one or two decimal places, an “accuracy” they have never achieved before, leading them to reach for a book to check the results and to mither about their inability to actually get exactly the same earth loop test results twice if they then repeated that test.

    That is a comment that has stuck in my head for over twenty four years, another comment that sticks in my head is that having purchased more testers than I now need, I have spoken to both the technical department of a tester manufacturer and their team on the trade show stands I have been advised to keep them all, because they all measure in different ways and some days one will work better than the others, not the answer you want, but true.