EICR C2 on missing RCDs on existing installation

I had an EICR done on my property which I let and currently has tenants in it. The previous EICR in 2020 came back with no observations, so I was very surprised that this time I got C2 on missing RCDs on the distribution board (411.3.3; 415.1), final circuits for socket outlets up to 32 A (411.3.3), concealed cables in walls (522.6.202 and .203) and lighting circuits (411.3.4.), cables passing through zones 1/2 (701.411.3.3.) and for location which requires IP-rating (701.512.2.).

I of course absolutely want to ensure electrical safety and full compliance with the applicable laws and standards in my flat. However I am surprised, that the installation which at the time of completion in 2008 was certified safe and also passed the inspection in 2020, has now suddenly become unsafe due to missing RCD. To my understanding it is rare, that standard updates are applied to existing installations to this extent, and in a manner that requires immediate and extensive updates carried out within 28 days (deadline given on the report). Would anybody be able to confirm if this interpretation made by the engineer is correct, and indeed all landlords in the UK are now required to update electrical systems in their properties, if the RCDs are not present? 

Thank you

Parents
  • As an example of industry guidance, you could look at https://niceic.com/getmedia/1acf8e45-b5a1-40ed-b066-d5f18674f99e/best-practice-guide-4-issue-7.pdf

    It is complex, and far from definitive - a socket not covered by an RCD unlikley to be used for outdoor kit might be a C3 but one serving a room with a shower might be C2 for example.  Is a socket by a door 'likely to be used' for say a lawnmower?

    I can see how two experts can reach differing conclusions. And not all inspectors of rented property are experts. Some very much not...

    It is perfectly reasonable to seek quotes from someone not doing the inspection, and I'd be very wary indeed of an inspector insisting that only they can do the work involved...

    Equally how old is the installation? Wiring that is nearly 20 years old and heavily used  may also have other things wrong with it, and there may be a tendency to suggest a complete refit, when perhaps a piecemeal method may be less disruptive. Or of course it may be in spit spot condition and good for the next half a century - from here we cannot see.

    Mike.

Reply
  • As an example of industry guidance, you could look at https://niceic.com/getmedia/1acf8e45-b5a1-40ed-b066-d5f18674f99e/best-practice-guide-4-issue-7.pdf

    It is complex, and far from definitive - a socket not covered by an RCD unlikley to be used for outdoor kit might be a C3 but one serving a room with a shower might be C2 for example.  Is a socket by a door 'likely to be used' for say a lawnmower?

    I can see how two experts can reach differing conclusions. And not all inspectors of rented property are experts. Some very much not...

    It is perfectly reasonable to seek quotes from someone not doing the inspection, and I'd be very wary indeed of an inspector insisting that only they can do the work involved...

    Equally how old is the installation? Wiring that is nearly 20 years old and heavily used  may also have other things wrong with it, and there may be a tendency to suggest a complete refit, when perhaps a piecemeal method may be less disruptive. Or of course it may be in spit spot condition and good for the next half a century - from here we cannot see.

    Mike.

Children
No Data