I am about to audit a property tested by a contractor.
on the report it has a C2 code but also states rectified, while we like a record of repairs and the previous code assigned, im not sure its correct to have a C2 on a satifactory EICR?
I am about to audit a property tested by a contractor.
on the report it has a C2 code but also states rectified, while we like a record of repairs and the previous code assigned, im not sure its correct to have a C2 on a satifactory EICR?
That looks like some organization's model form, so that approach might be encouraged by them
I would say that an EICR does not require rectifications to be recorded (assuming that they are done at the same visit), but nor is their recording prohibited.
I like the approach - it gives me confidence.
I like the approach - it gives me confidence.
I'd agree 'found it & fixed it' needs to be recorded or you cant see what was done or explain the bill but to my mind, then the residual code reported should be ' no code' as the problem has already been dealt with. If you must then perhaps have 2 cols, before and after rectification.
Mike.
I like the approach - it gives me confidence.
I'd agree 'found it & fixed it' needs to be recorded or you cant see what was done or explain the bill but to my mind, then the residual code reported should be ' no code' as the problem has already been dealt with. If you must then perhaps have 2 cols, before and after rectification.
Mike.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site