How might the proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits affect older electrical infrastructure?

Hi all,
I’m looking for some expert insight into how proposed changes to UK mains voltage limits, particularly any shift away from the nominal 230 to 240 volt range, might affect older electrical infrastructure.
Our site is fed directly from a DNO transformer, although only two of its output connections are currently in use and we’re unsure how many it has in total. The infrastructure was originally designed and installed in the 1980s and includes legacy three-phase motors and analogue control systems that were built to operate on 240 volts single-phase and 440 volts three-phase.
We also have a step-down transformer that is fed by a three-phase 125 amp supply and provides 110 volts at 50 hertz. This is used to meet extra-low voltage requirements in our training environment. In addition, there is a separate system currently locked out that runs on 115 volts at 60 hertz, which is temporarily offline due to a failed frequency converter. This is scheduled for replacement shortly.
I’m particularly interested in understanding how any changes to mains voltage might affect the transformers themselves, both the DNO-fed unit and our internal step-down transformers. I would also appreciate any thoughts on the risks to analogue control systems calibrated for 240 and 440 volts, potential safety or compliance concerns from undervoltage or harmonics introduced by modern supply variations, and any practical mitigation strategies or retrofit options for mixed-voltage and mixed-frequency setups.
Any advice, experiences, or references to standards would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Parents
  • Well currently the voltage can be anywhere from 216 to 253, and the proposal is only to declare the 5% below (207 to 216 ) as no longer out of spec. The intention is to allow it to droop a bit more when EVs are charging and maybe set the taps one click lower so it has the freedom to surge a bit more without going out of limits on sites where that is an issue when embedded generation kicks in.
    In some ways actually this proposal is only acknowledgement of what is already happening...

    I will be very surprised if DNOs rush around shifting any transformer settings except where there are persistent reports/ complaints of things being too low or too high, and this really allows them to say they don't need to do so just yet in a few edge cases.

    If you don't already have voltage problems, I suspect you won't see any changes at all, until additional solar panels or EV chargers are added at your site, and then only if the additions force a change of transformer configurations.

    At that point whole site step up or step down may be worth a look, but very few things are that critical.

    If as it sounds, you are the only load on the transformer, then it is not uncommon to ask the DNO to set it a bit high or a bit low as your local needs require, and normally they can oblige. (typically 2.5% steps )

    Mike

  • In terms of effects, transformers run a bit cooler and buzz less, and motors take longer to spin up. Anything with feedback to control its speed will still level off to the same value, unless it was already at its upper limit, but may well take longer to get there. You may find that as voltage drops, the fault current reduces and the operation of breakers and fuses gets slower - not so much an issue if a fuse takes 6 seconds instead of 5, but a breaker that is supposed to fast trip , may not fast trip if the circuit impedance is marginal, on a low voltage day. If this really matters is often hard to tell - quite often, especially in cases with RCBOs and earth fault relays, it really does not, as the breaker part is only protecting cables from overload and overheating effects, while the fast safety of life is handled by the RCD part which is always fast.
    Mike.

  • Thankyou Mike, Thankyou for taking the time to reply.

  • Do check back in a day or two, I'm sure others will also have an opinion ;-) 
    Mike.

    PS In the past I have seen problems with persistent low voltages and an alarm  panel and emergency lights not recharging fully, where lead acid cells were involved and the charger was a simple unregulated transformer and rectifier set. More modern ones have regulated supplies and proper battery management to 13.8V float, and then its not an issue. And lead acid cells are not the only type used these days so makers and installers are a bit more aware.

Reply
  • Do check back in a day or two, I'm sure others will also have an opinion ;-) 
    Mike.

    PS In the past I have seen problems with persistent low voltages and an alarm  panel and emergency lights not recharging fully, where lead acid cells were involved and the charger was a simple unregulated transformer and rectifier set. More modern ones have regulated supplies and proper battery management to 13.8V float, and then its not an issue. And lead acid cells are not the only type used these days so makers and installers are a bit more aware.

Children
No Data