PV Inverters - Some questions of understanding

When the inverter say max DC power 37.5kW should I assume that this is the total sum across all 6 strings that can be connected?

I'd say that was the maximum total - there might even be an assumption that it's evenly divided (e.g. max 12.5kW per MPPT or max 6.25kW per string). It's not unknown for inverters to be rated somewhat lower than the panel outputs though - on the basis that much of the UK (especially more northern areas) don't ever get to 'standard' conditions, and the loss of output on the rare occasions output is maxed out doesn't justify the cost of a larger inverter (I've a 2.14kWp system with a 2kW inverter).

what does the 2 strings per MPPT mean 

Good question about the series/parallel connection internally - I don't know, I'd suggest asking the manufacturer. But on the basis of the MPPT is meant to optimise the panel outputs I would have thought the two strings would have to be pretty much matched for it to work properly - i.e. same number of same type of panels, subject to the same aspect/shading - otherwise what'll be optimal for one string won't be optimal for the other. I could be wrong, but that's my (erring on the side of safety) guess.

The AC power of the inverter is going to be balanced (current per phase) or it somehow depends on how I connect the strings on the DC side?

I would hope that everything went onto the same DC bus and the three inverters ran from there - often you have two MPPTs on single phase inverters - and one might be used for East facing panels and the other for West facing. It would be odd if the 3-phase inverter was less flexible in that respect - but I've been wrong before.

  - Andy.

you clearly have a unit in mind as you show the connector drawings - if you tell us what model it is, it may be possible to be more specific with the answer - usually such things are in the documentation, if somewhat disguised or can be deduced from the performance data.

And given the way inverters work, I'd expect each of  the panel strings to be boost converted up to a common DC bus, at some  voltage higher then any of them and then that DC is then sliced and diced to generate the 3 phases. But as always, there maybe some manufacturer specific caveats.
Mike.

PS missed the exam question. The two strings into any one MPPT boost converter are in effect wired in parallel, but probably (well, I hope) diode combined, so if one is very weak, the winner  (higher voltage) takes all the load, or if the outputs are comparable, the current share out varies until the voltages are the same (i.e, the better lit one droops a bit more until it reaches the voltage the other, less well lit, string can sustain). As solar panels under a given level of solar flux are more or less constant current devices, this is not as poor practice as it sounds, but even so the 2 strings should made be as similar as possible, and if you have the choice it is more efficient to use one MPPT per string.

Realize that the mppt alters its 'transformation ratio' (I know its DC and it is a lot of  switched mode cleverness, but this is a simplified explanation) to try to set the input impedance to try and get the highest voltage before the current falls away , so is always settles at about 80-90% of open circuit voltage and about  70-80% of short circuit current.

Good afternoon

I did not post the exact model because I wasnt sure about the IET Forum policy and naming products

Anyway

Here is the inverter

Today I had to call their technical department and they told me that

1. All 3 MPPTs are INDEPENDENT from one another

2. The 2 strings of each MPPT are connected internally IN PARALLEL so they told me I have to have EXACTLY same number of PV panels per string

3. Total Amps per MPPT is 32A so each of the 2 strings should be max 16A

What I did not understand was what would happen in case one string is 10 panels and the other string of the same MPPT is 11 panels.

That means you parallel to slightly different volltages

When I asked the question he told me something like

"It will peak the lesser string that is the 10 panel one"

but when I asked what he meant his accent did not help much to understand more

"It will peak the lesser string that is the 10 panel one"

that is because that the mmpt will settle to a voltage where the there is a shoulder in the I/V curve- and when 2 unequal strings are in pseudo-parallel that shoulder will be the lower one, as the way to find that optimum is to   current reduce the current, monitoring the voltage rises, and then voltage rate of rise slows even though the current is still falling at the same rate, that is the shoulder...

Did my explanation earlier in the thread which basically says the same help make sense ?

If not I can have another go....

Mike.  

An example of a stepped IV curve when one of the 2 trings is a panel short - here an operating point near the lower knee has the larger total area (power) unless the lower knee is a lot less than half the current, but ideally something closer to the blue curve is desired.

"It will peak the lesser string that is the 10 panel one"

that is because that the mmpt will settle to a voltage where the there is a shoulder in the I/V curve- and when 2 unequal strings are in pseudo-parallel that shoulder will be the lower one, as the way to find that optimum is to   current reduce the current, monitoring the voltage rises, and then voltage rate of rise slows even though the current is still falling at the same rate, that is the shoulder...

Did my explanation earlier in the thread which basically says the same help make sense ?

If not I can have another go....

Mike.  

An example of a stepped IV curve when one of the 2 trings is a panel short - here an operating point near the lower knee has the larger total area (power) unless the lower knee is a lot less than half the current, but ideally something closer to the blue curve is desired.