Micc or FP200 cable in chapels or churches ?

Hello, looking for an answer to who decides if a chapel / church needs to wired in MICC cable or will FP200 be adequate ? I appreciate it should be fire resistant and MICC is smaller and looks great if installed properly , but I cant find any guidance anywhere 

Parents
  • Usually price is the deciding facter, MICC is very expensive to both buy and fit. A Company I worked for was rewiring the outside/garden lights for Shakespeares birthplace. We started with MICC, but it was taking so long to install that it was eventually changed to copper/gold coloured FP200, which was fitted in less than half the time, and looked as good. Probably nowhere near as durable or long lasting, but half the price.

  • Probably nowhere near as durable or long lasting

    The traditional bare MICC didn't always do that well in old churches - the often damp and sometimes alkaline conditions (e.g. where in contact with lime mortar) doesn't seem to do the bare copper sheath much good at all - never mind the unreliability of some the seals over time.

       - Andy. 

  • agree - there was plenty of green grot and lower than expected IR results and some quite scratchy earthing. When very wet the sheath sometimes splits, much like a failing kettle element.  I'd not expect FP to be immortal in that situation either though !

    However when well installed in a reasonably dry location, pyro is more or less indestructible.

    It was the cotton covered rubber flex to the old lamp-holders that usually let the side down first...

    Mike

  • Thanks 

Reply Children
No Data