Calibration of Approved Voltage Indicators and Proving Units.

There was an old discussion on this 7 years ago but it is locked now. In any case there was no definitive answer provided at the time. In years gone by, I would have thought that AVIs and PUs either work or they dont.

But searching online today, Martindale recommend that their AVI's and PU's do need calibrating. This has prompted me to rethink and I note that in GS38 point 30 talks about all test equipment being maintained by a competent person and one of the common errors being failing to verify correct function of illumination (eg indicator/lamp/neon).

If something were to go wrong, and it turns out the AVI and PU were not calibrated within the last 12 months, I can imagine this wording above being used to attribute blame to the person who was undertaking the proving dead.

When we prove the AVI with the PU, we are putting voltage onto the AVI and simply seeing that the lamps light up, but the PU just puts out the max voltage it is capable of, it doesnt step up or down each voltage level individually, so we dont control the level it is proving at. 

What's other peoples thoughts? I am considering now that we do need to calibrate these items.

Parents
  • The terms "making dead" and "proving dead" possibly hail from the Electricity at Work Regulations (https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/hsr25.pdf) - so it's convenient to use the same terms when trying to have the same meaning (otherwise you open the door much wider to lawyers to argue about interpretation).

    As others have touched on, for there to be a problem you need a situation where the indicator doesn't light up when a hazardous voltage is present - that would mean two simultaneous faults - both the indicator would need to have drifted sufficiently that it didn't light up until a significantly higher than intended and the proving unit produced a similarly inflated voltage so it looked like the inductor was working properly when it wasn't. If the two are used together fairly regularly not only would the faults need to be present at the same time, but would have to occur one pretty soon after the other (or at least in the right order) otherwise there's be a period when the proving would fail. All in all the odds seem pretty long (and probably a lot smaller than a lot of the other risks - e.g. from borrowed neutrals).

       - Andy.

  • This is when you need a single pole contact voltage tester.

Reply Children
No Data