This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

What do I expect from IET – Community - France & Paris.

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Firstly who are the IET Fr MIET members?

I joined this PEI in 1980 from Grenoble. I was on substantive leave from MoD. I decided to stay for a longer period and got married here. At that time we were the first to come over with the EU agreements of that period.

There were already ex-patriot UK people with huge benefits living here, there were the UK EU adventurers with no objectives but work was abundant, there were the first student exchanges, and some had married into French families. I did not meet any UK people who simply came here to live and work at that time.

 

Most of us found the difference between the UK and France as difficult as between the UK and China. They just did not live, eat or drink like us.

 

I was advised by the first UK settlers to just join in and enjoy myself, which I did.

I first met French culture when I organised the “entente cordiale” between the Concorde R&D groups of UK RAE and French ONERA. It was unbelievable, when the opportunity to have a job and career change came, I took up nuclear engineering in France.

 

I returned to the UK which had drastically changed – Thatcher, strikes, riots. My name  was plagiarised in my work. I had to leave the UK after my employers failed to protect me. I returned to France.

The first time every one talked of the quality of life in France, the second time it was the Iraqi wars and crisis.

 

So what do you need to work and survive in France now and how can the IET French Community help.

France is huge; it is not realistic to travel from SE or SW France for a meeting in Paris.

Maybe we need a newcomers guide such as most French towns give to new arrivals.

France is still totally different from the UK.

We have different categories of IET members who are at least engineering & technology related.

 -Ex-patriot, UK enterprise sales & marketing staff, Erasmus students, Enterprises from the UK that have delocalised with their staff, those that have married into families, entrepreneurs and SMEs in IT technology and those that now just want to work and live in France etc.

What would you advise
  • Should we have a MIET arrivals’ guide

  • Should we have guides to French language courses

  • Should we have guides to CPD in France

  • Should we give advice on French administration

  • What about the dos and don’ts of French culture.


Or should we just mind our own business and keep it to ourselves?

 

I recommend reading : Stephen Clarke – 1000 years of annoying the French and other titles and most of his references. French English history is not as taught in schools.
  •  Out of season hotels in France are cheap, maybe one or two visits with IET families or friends to E&T venues could be affordable.


And the French Community AGM & voting should be on line and at distance.

I’m retiring from E&T have fun in France

 

Give Rob McCann some help

 

John Gowman MIET (ex ITEME Grenobl 1980)

 

  • David Houssein Brilliant, David <grin>.  It's a shame I've been rumbled tho', I always open all of my IET emails multiple times, got to get the numbers up somehow!!!


    More seriously, I find the stats a little worrying.  First off, I don't really believe I opened that annual dinner email 15 times.  Once certainly, maybe twice, just maybe three times, but 15?  On top of which I believe Adestra relies on the fetching of embedded images from a central server to determine who opens what how many times.  On my main machine I have fetching embedded images turned off, that leaves the phone and the tablet where it is turned on (note to self: gotta get that fixed!).


    Thank you for making the time and taking the trouble to dig a bit deeper, I know it's a pain and time consuming but I believe it will lead to a better understanding of what we are doing.


    From the numbers you quote, I don't believe I can answer the question I posed: what proportion of IET France members are not subscribed to emails?  Of email delivery attempts pretty much all were successful (so bounces are not a serious issue), 34% of delivered messages were opened (sometimes quite frequently!), and 3% had links clicked (hopefully not the "unsubscribe" one!).  One interpretation of what you say suggests that some 10% of members have unsubscribed, would this be a correct interpretation?  The doubt arises because I don't know whether the list delivered from the IET systems to Adestra also excludes some unsubscribed members (ie in addition to the Adestra unsubscribe list).


    Keith

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Ref -William Davis
    I am a CEng MIET working in France. I work on the ITER project so my position is probably different from most other MIETs in France - if I leave ITER I don't intend to stay in France.
    ·         Is it useful for the IET to promote the IET as a brand in France? Promotion of EC(UK) registration in France would be more useful, but must be done with a single voice in combination with the other EC(UK) institutions
    ·         The most useful thing the IET could do in France is make it easy for us to contact other MIETs and members of other EC(UK) institutions in our local area - ICE, IMechE, BCS, even smaller ones like the Nuclear Institute and the Institution of Measurement and Control - otherwise I have to become a non-paying member of all these other institutions, and I don't even know if that is possible.
    ·         Personally I would prefer that there was a single professional engineering institution for EC(UK) registration, not split up into IET, BCS, IMechE, ICE, etc. A separate institution for each engineering discipline is just overly complicated and dilutes the community and public voice of our profession. Even if we can't manage this in the UK, please can we at least make this possible in other countries?

    William,

    Your suggestion was the objective of I Mech I E which amalgamated with other PEIs outside of the major CEng PEIs, small institutes did the same and we came together to form IIE which was a CEng & IEng PEI and then with IEE we created IET.
    The I Mec E and the Civil engineers put a stop to this amalgamation.
    We wanted a “Groupement d’Interet”- no word for that in English, it is a group of companies working on a single project without binding contracts.
    I have suggested an umbrella organization and UKEC is not disagreed with that idea. Prof EFF has suggested much the same.
    In Europe the UK PEI’s and other professional associations are meeting and working together. It seems that the UK will not accept any form of change to the Professional Registration whilst the PEIs want to be independent and dominant.

    You work for ITER, I was nominated engineer in charge at JET as I had saved the project from blocking points on five occasions. I do not know if you are a contractor or an EU ITER employee. You should make it clear that you have, apart from the best job in the world, a return ticket to the UK. We lesser mortals have to fight the markets and politicians to survive.

    ITER, ILL, CERN are the best examples of Engineering & Technology with equal national and gender status. This is supposed to be IET’s goal. But like all big projects IET has gone through the first phase; is being modified in the second phase; and will be taken over by staff and CEng Electricals in the third stage - as on most big projects. This is why EURATOM, CERN, ILL reorganize and start afresh every so often. The model cannot be kept up-with from the first day.

    IET, ECUK, & PEI’s will have to change or they will be changed externally or internally.

    What we are seeing in Europe is the first stage of change, market forces will take over from the status quo. If we need to communicate and cooperate as engineering & technology professionals, we will do so with or without HQ.

    Let’s look at ITER; The House of Lords has said it is Cloud Cuckoo Land, Cowley says he will never see Fusion energy (he resigned), Llewellyn-Smith says it will work, but not efficiently, in 2050.
    I will not give my point of view here.

    So what is so good about ITER?

    It is the holistic effect of putting together several hundred of the world’s top technologies with the best technologists it can find. Do they believe in Fusion? It is not important, what is important is developing leading technology together ( there are better ways of doing this but no one has succeeded).

    What ITER is doing, is what this blog is trying to do – put together technologists from all domains to communicate and cooperate; in Europe, outside of the UK restrictions.
    We are not interested in Asia or elsewhere, we are interested in ourselves and our technologies. We are in unfamiliar ground and not helped by the systems where we live. Some have made a break and others are sitting tight and not integrating.

    My question was; is it worth having an IET outpost in France (& Europe); for what objective and is it realistic or worthwhile?
    At ITER you have everything.
    I have had no contact with UK PEIs and I have made a good effort to integrate into Technology in France, ( I cannot give details). I have seen many give up and go back to the UK.

    I’ve got the ball rolling, what you have said sums up the situation.
    Members have to do what they want to do, we are not a club, we are like minded professionals and in France we have liberty, seek fraternity and would like equality with Grande Ecoles.
    I think the replies on this blog have exposed the problem, the difficulties and there is a team willing to organize and communicate.

    I’m bowing now.
    John Gowman. 

  • Kindly note that I have unsubscribed from this thread for two reasons.

    Firstly, it is quite clear that HQ does not want to understand that communications with members are not as they would like to believe. I looked up my first posts on this and find that nothing has evolved in TWO YEARS. Whether we are talking LN, Communities, Sectors, HQ staff have no idea about the effectiveness of the communication tools and don't seem to want to know.

    Secondly, one Member has been bashing our ears with his personal blog without ever offering, now, in the past nor in the future, to participate in IET France LN organisation. Some of what he writes is insulting to past and present volunteers and if nobody is prepared to blow the whistle I have to take my own precaution.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Michael Wrigley:


    1. Firstly, it is quite clear that HQ does not want to understand that communications with members are not as they would like to believe. I looked up my first posts on this and find that nothing has evolved in TWO YEARS.



    2. Whether we are talking LN, Communities, Sectors, HQ staff have no idea about the effectiveness of the communication tools and don't seem to want to know.




    1. Communications really are what we believe. I can't really help you if you value your own anecdotal evidence over the vast data we have access to.

    2. Sorry to have to call you out in a public way, but we have to consider that many members may be reading this and believe it to be true if it goes unchallenged. We do know the effectiveness and the evidence of that has been presented just a few posts back. You are seriously bringing into question the competence and integrity of my team and it is highly insulting to state, like it's actually a fact, that we do not want to know either. I don't really know how you reach these conclusions, but I would ask you to substantiate any further claims.


    For closure, we had a closer look at your profile and found that you updated your address in January 2017 and CZ then became your primary network. This meant that the system, quite reasonably, assumes that you don't want to know about France anymore. If you do, you can now simply go into MyIET and select France as a secondary network. That will resolve this for you.

    44cd914b6210003375267193df69da35-huge-france.jpg


    Can I suggest this thread now gets back on track? Getting into the detail on individual agendas is probably going to discourage others from getting involved. 

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    To
    communities.




    I have complained about
    Mr Wrigley after checking the net. You dumped my
    complaint.




    The net has no interest
    in document management, so there are out of date references to
    Michael which would confuse most people.

    I would call him a modern
    European entrepreneur, an electron libre who is based in the UK and
    CK probably for fiscal and professional reasons.





    His comments are on the
    limit, for example Diesel cars having access to Paris for IET
    meetings, there are Critères to respect, if you do not have a
    critère your car
    will be impounded and you have to pay 130€ fine. He has no critère;
    I have critère 5 and am no longer allowed in Paris on working
    days.





    The whole idea of LN and
    communities has to be re-examined.

    It has been my work for
    the last 15 years to “surveille” complicated engineering projects,
    and organizations . IET needs to do the same.

    IET has drifted away from
    its ideals in 2006, You staff members work to IET management rules
    so no one can complain, but IET has failed in the UK, as I have
    said, we have lost the IEng ideal, we are not recruiting the 3
    million no registered PEs and the UK treatment of women is
    disgraceful.




    You
    The IET Direction has
    taken a path that no longer interests me, and as a founder member
    of engineering & technology, at ITEME >>> IIE I see no
    real interest in its ideals of  globalization,
    commoditization  CEng and electrical hegemony all leading to
    rival and obstructive communities in the UK, Europe and
    worldwide.

    I have to agree with both
    IET staff and Michael Wrigley.

    My interest is that young
    professional of both genders, at all grades and with sound links
    with the UK should be registered on an PE register in the UK
    without referees, proposers and assossors. (I have applied for C
    Eng on five occasions from France through other PEIs and have been
    refused) I should be CEng. I have refused IIE Honary membership as
    I could not find the means to apply my self to IET and to keeping a
    professional status in Europe.




    Working in Europe is
    tough if you do it on your own.




    I was nominated to run
    the IIE as “Secretary” and stood down to let a woman have a chance.
    She seems to be one of the IET top staff now.




    The French LN – Please
    have IET legal dept check out in detail what I say from
    experience.

    This is a complicated set
    up as Michael has stated.
    We are an association
    under the law 1901; this means that any person of any origin social
    status, education or gender cannot be refused membership. We have
    to present the accounts to the French authorities each year the
    association is liable to its owner who takes full responsibility
    for the legal actions of the association.




    In no way can LN IET
    France be influenced or controlled by an outside foreign body. Thus
    IET has no say in IET community France.

    This associations was
    called IEE what its status and name is now I have no
    idea.

    I do not know who is a
    member of the French association IEE I have not been invited to
    vote for the executive.




    We have your LN which is
    the French communities. This is what HQ is concerned
    about.

    It is what happens in
    France. But you have no rite under French law to have a private
    association which is not an Association Law 1901.

    This is why I said our
    president could be at risk in France, the consequences of not
    respecting the law 1901 is a bit like treason in France. Do not
    forget we have Riots & Revolutions here, Mai 68 spoilt my
    holidays.




    I have not been able to
    contact IET France until Lisa sent me an email a few years ago when
    she ran the French LN communication. I have voted twice for the Fr
    LN committee, I have been a member here since 1880 – 83 & 1991
    to now, I joined the Fr LN two years ago.

    UK IET members resident
    in France are expatriots with full advantages, UK government
    financed R&D staff, of major projects, workers transferred here
    with no options but to accept, and entrepreneurs who a testing
    Europe and of course those who are married into or have French
    families.

    There are probably twice
    as many PEs here who are not members of PEIs not CEng or IEng and
    are contract or short term employees of engineering or sales
    companies. Most of the two groups have great difficulty in
    participating in IET france because the country is very big and
    transport is difficult if you do not go to Paris.

    We just went for a day at
    the sea side 8 hours transport and 840 KM.




    Your solutions are not
    easy.


    1.    
    Do a Kaisen 5S


    2.    
    Do nothing;  leave
    things as they are


    3.    
    Set  up a Paris
    office of democratically voted (IET French residents)


    4.    
    Let only French resident
    MIETs be voting members


    5.    
    Let Rob and other multi
    card PEI holders organize joint PEI events with universities and
    major enterprises.


    6.    
    Run all events from HQ
    UK


    7.    
    Use MIET volunteers
    organize events and call on HQ to do the ground work




    Why not run down all EU
    LNs set up LN EU from the UK; let multi card PEI holders organize
    joint PEI events with universities and major
    enterprises?




    IET has a major problem
    with IT communication, you might think it is all working well, LN
    Fr members are not being informed.

    I will not use social
    networks, I think many have the same attitude.


    ·  Those that want to and
    have time to can volunteer

    *  We only need to
    vote once a year for the LN if it is in France or the
    UK.


    ·        
    We need to know, well in
    advance if there are any interesting events we could possibly
    attend.


    ·        
    New comers need to know
    of the pitfalls of living in Europe.


    ·        
    They need to know of CPD
    possibilities in France I undertook much of my CPD in France with
    leading organizations.


    ·        
    They need to know how to
    learn French ( I learnt French after GCE O Level in 3
    months)




    IIE had no office in
    France – we did not really need one, we had a very good journal and
    I would think that most people lived too far away to make personal
    contact. I am not sure that I would want to make personal contact
    any way.




    I have written to the
    President, to membership and have been ignored.




    I have written to ECUK
    and they agree with me but have no right to take any action
    concerning the running of PEIs If we had the UK 2016 Engineering
    review and Prof Eff’s report which was very damaging, there is a
    real problem with IET and all PEIs in the UK.




    I see the Uk residents
    holding joint PEI meetings all across Europe as a very good
    solution to the PEI decline and mismanagement.

    We need a 5S of the
    whole system.

    My job was to pin-point
    the errors and hidden vices, I reported to my superiors who
    reported to the President (of france). He took action
    immediately.

     

    Let’s close this blog and
    see some positive action.




    John Gowman
    MIET



     British, resident
    in France, too far away from Paris




  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    To communities & LN MIET France

    Last communication to Communities HQ & France.

    1. Commoditization:, selling something which previously had no value but is now commoditized  for profit.

    • IET membership France LN and CEng Europe.

    Solution

    1. LN France run by volunteers in France, but registered and administered from IET HQ UK.

    • Let IET members in Europe be FEANI registered Eur IEngwith BSc University degrees.

    • LN France is for MIETs who reside or work in France only.

    Comments & observations.
    There were at least members from IEE and ITEME resident in France in 1980; this is as far back as we need to go as these people will have reached the 67 years of age retirement age.
    ITEME members had no EU LN, They were UK registered PEs and any other Title was useless in Europe, some were FEANI members before FEANI changed to create EUR Ing.
    IEE had a French LN seat.
    IET changed the situation.

    Now we do not know how many LN Fr registered MIET actually reside in France, or where the concentration of numbers lies.
    IET LN Fr is French registered 1901 Association and an also IET Community. This is confusing to say the least.
    I have called for a clarification and reorganization that meets: EU, French & UK legislation for professional associations.

    Firstly :

    • Let’s get LN France back to promoting Engineering & Technology for all grades, genders for MIET resident in or working with or in France.

    • Then make this the rule for all IET LN in Europe – before BREXIT.

    • Get back to IET basics set out in 2006.

    • As CEng or IENG or Eng Tech is only useful for those who wish to return to the UK or work with the UK; promote Eur Ing FEANI for all who want a registered PE title in Europe, this can be achieved with BSc and HQ will help any MIET who is interested.

    • The French LN should go back to UK PE basics and help non University MEng or BSc PEs to follow the long route for CEng or IEng UK ECUK PE registration or even the possible new registration of Professional Engineer.

    • Make a geographical survey of member’ domiciles and make it public without breaking any IT security laws. In France marketing asks you for your Department Number, IET could do the same.

    MIET Volunteers resident in France could continue, as before, with their administration carried out by IET paid staff in Communities HQ UK.
    It is probably a fair statement to say that the Fr LN cannot be organized as in the UK or Benelux, as France is a huge country and communication is poor.
    The LNs in Europe are showing ECUK and the UK PEIs how to cooperate, communicate and work together with their combined PEI, University and International industrial groups’ seminars and meetings.
    Technology visits can be conceived in France and organized by IET Communities, being open to all members, staff and other interested bodies.

    In conclusion,
    LN France can be run legally from HQ UK without changing the setup we have today.
    All MIET domiciled in France should be informed of LN Fr elections and meetings.
    This should not involve IT tools that no one knows of or is interested in. An Email is sufficient, or a mention in Members’ News sent by the post.
    Why not give the results of the LN Fr survey on residents’ departments in Members’ News.

    Why make it complicated when you can make it simple.
    Or just stay as we are.

    John Gowman, MIET, British, resident in France
    EU Classification :  EU industrial vagabond ( has this changed now?) 
    This includes Gypsies and PEs working outside of their EU homeland.

    JGowman, MIET Member registered in France since 1980 probably one of IET’s longest EU LN members still professionally active. I have only met one person from IET in France and that was Rob last year.
    RSVP