Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 47 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 3739 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Who is the electrical installation designer?

AncientMariner
With my County Councillor hat on (many of you are aware that besides being a retired Merchant Navy Officer and a former Civil Servant (RAF avionics) I am currently a County Councillor, in Wales - with their own Part P!) I have been asked for advice regarding a new electrical installation in a barn conversion.


It is not a re-wire, since there was no electrical installation there at all previously, but instead this is the complete electrical installation for a four bedroom holiday accommodation to a high standard.


Now the problem:  The switching for lighting is idiotic. By this I mean that 1) The outside lighting adjacent to doors and for patios and hot-tub area, is controlled by various switches in bedrooms often with the illuminated outside area not adjacent to the outside door or switch. Generally 2-gang switches with the other gang for the room itself. 2) Bedside lights have been configured so that at either side of each bed there is a 2-way switch to the other side of the bed which switches on the down lights from the ceiling for both sides of the bed. Again these switches are 2-gang and the other gang switches the main ceiling lights, which negates the purpose of having supposedly separate over-bed lighting. The owners wish was that each side of the bed controlled the ceiling down light for that side of the bed without any need or requirement to have this 2-way with the other side. 3) there are areas with steps where due to the local lighting location, you end up walking into darkness.


Being holiday accommodation, you are not there long enough to learn the idiosyncrasies of the switching arrangement, and the fear is that a holiday resident may be injured


It is fixable, but only by cutting through the new plaster and decoration in various locations in each room. But that is somewhat extreme and destructive for a brand new installation. Another electrician has estimated around £2,000 to fix, but that would entail some exposed wiring outside. 


Originally a quote was given for the work and in time the 1st fix was paid for at that stage.    Now the bill for 2nd fix has arrived and it is greater (just under £2,000 greater) than quoted. The customer has paid the NICEIC registered electrician the quotation price plus money for agreed extras (a couple of hundred). In response the electrician is threatening small claims court unless his inflated Invoice for some £1,000 more is paid by year end.


His excuse is that he was not given the architects plans showing what was required, in reality what was wanted was by discussion and with locations etc marked on the walls before wiring and plastering.


So as per my post title, who is the electrical installation designer?  Who is responsible for drawing up a diagram of what is wanted/required?  The property owner is not electrically qualified.


And of course, what should the person who contacted me (property owner) do?


Many thanks.


Clive




  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Architect is responsible (that's one reason they charge so much) as they are supposed to supervise the entire build.


    This touches on what used to be my favourite sport!


    Go into the architects meeting with the client as his representative and wait for the opportunity to talk about the EL and FA items all very neatly dotted all over the drawings and casually ask the architect if he had done these designs.

    Mindful of charging the client for the design as a percentage of the cost of these installs (typically 15%) the architect's immediate response was "yes" said quite dismissively.

    My response was to hand over the appropriate BS certificates with the address etc prefilled and say that "you won't mind signing the design part of these then" as a statement............

    You could hear reverse gear being engaged without using the clutch!!!

    My next response was to say that the pretty dots are just an "artist's impression" then.............

    Same went for the electrical certificate. 


    Odd, I never worked out why I was never invited to any of their "corporate days out", ultimately financed by the client................


    Regards


    BOD

  • 0
    Never mind BOD, you were never on the "Gravy train". Too honest I suggest but proof may be required.......
  • 0
    The design is possibly perfect from an electrical safety point of view, so the electrician may have well complied with the relevant design requirements.


    Was the electrician supplied with an external works plan showing where paths and steps are? How much preparation did the person requesting the work and the people acting as their agents actually do?


    Surely the contractor must have been given some sort of specification stating what lighting is required along with a schedule of fittings or included a schedule with the quote.


    The outside lighting could all be controlled with PIR switches and the internal switches replaced with key switches.


    You know what electrician Benjamin Franklin had to say about failing to plan.



  • 0
    Sparkingchip:

    You know what electrician Benjamin Franklin had to say about failing to plan.


    The six Ps?


  • 0
    There’s rather a lot of Benjamin Franklin quotes, including “When in doubt, don’t” 

    https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/benjamin-franklin-quotes
  • 0
     

    Given that this work is for a holiday let, it is difficult to see how the client could be a "domestic client".


    My understanding of the Regulations (which are not excessively long) is that the responsibilities of the Principal Designer are to ensure that the programme of work is safe and that work complies with the appropriate standards (including BS 7671). I don't see any statutory duty to ensure that the design does what the client wants it to do. That is a matter of contract.




    I understood that may have been the case, so this bit of my diatribe applies:

     



    Now, here's the rub for the poor electrician/contractor. If the works were  more extensive than the electrical work, and they failed to ascertain who the Principal Contractor or Designer was, they were not legally entitled to start work under CDM Regulations.


    So, in essence, the question always comes back to the electrical contractor / electrician, and I think the burden is on them unless they can demonstrate otherwise.



    Basically, if the contractual arrangements were there, it should be an easy question to answer. If not, the electrical contractor should not have started work.

     


  • 0
    Hopefully the contractor took photos of the marks on the walls before they were covered up ?
  • 0
    I suspect that no-one is going to rush to be responsible, for a badly defined job thoughtlessly implemented.

    now to fix it, it may be easier to install some wireless switches in the right places, rather than hack the place apart.

    the receiver goes where the switch would have gone or beside the fitting


    various switches are available


    Pricey in terms of parts, but maybe not once plastering and so forth is factored in.

    regards Mike.
  • 0
    gkenyon:
     

    Given that this work is for a holiday let, it is difficult to see how the client could be a "domestic client".


    My understanding of the Regulations (which are not excessively long) is that the responsibilities of the Principal Designer are to ensure that the programme of work is safe and that work complies with the appropriate standards (including BS 7671). I don't see any statutory duty to ensure that the design does what the client wants it to do. That is a matter of contract.




    I understood that may have been the case, so this bit of my diatribe applies:

     



    Now, here's the rub for the poor electrician/contractor. If the works were  more extensive than the electrical work, and they failed to ascertain who the Principal Contractor or Designer was, they were not legally entitled to start work under CDM Regulations.


    So, in essence, the question always comes back to the electrical contractor / electrician, and I think the burden is on them unless they can demonstrate otherwise.



    Basically, if the contractual arrangements were there, it should be an easy question to answer. If not, the electrical contractor should not have started work.

     




    Absolutely Graham. Unfortunately it is clear that the basic requirements of the CDM Regs have not arrived in many parts of electrical installation land. Many contractors remain completely oblivious and there appears to be little in the way of trying to get the message across. I make a deliberate attempt to embrace CDM as a founding feature of all our projects, especially the smaller ones where Clients want to use Jimmy the builder and Billy the spark. 


  • 0
    perspicacious:

     Architect is responsible (that's one reason they charge so much) as they are supposed to supervise the entire build.


    This touches on what used to be my favourite sport!


    Go into the architects meeting with the client as his representative and wait for the opportunity to talk about the EL and FA items all very neatly dotted all over the drawings and casually ask the architect if he had done these designs.

    Mindful of charging the client for the design as a percentage of the cost of these installs (typically 15%) the architect's immediate response was "yes" said quite dismissively.

    My response was to hand over the appropriate BS certificates with the address etc prefilled and say that "you won't mind signing the design part of these then" as a statement............

    You could hear reverse gear being engaged without using the clutch!!!

    My next response was to say that the pretty dots are just an "artist's impression" then.............

    Same went for the electrical certificate. 


    Odd, I never worked out why I was never invited to any of their "corporate days out", ultimately financed by the client................


    Regards


    BOD

     


    Bod. That just reminded me why we all love you so much.

    ?


Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines