Just seeking a wee bit of clarification on I delta m. Literature indicates that it is the maximum breaking capacity of residual current as distinct from the maximum breaking current. Just not sure how to interpret that.
Just seeking a wee bit of clarification on I delta m. Literature indicates that it is the maximum breaking capacity of residual current as distinct from the maximum breaking current. Just not sure how to interpret that.
This is a RCD so breaks only one kind of fault. Are they suggesting 1000A if no death and glory 100A fuse but 10000A with one? I have searched a lot of literature but cannot find a definitive answer.
I think that is probably what it means.
This link may help - see page 11.
As I understand it, Im is the rated breaking capacity and IΔm is the rated residual breaking capacity.
Confusingly, in BS7671, Im is something completely different.
yes - because the fuse goes first and by cutting the arc short limits the energy available that would presumably otherwise irreversible burn up or weld the RCB internals - presumably to an energy equivalent to about 1 % of the time that the RCD part alone takes if damage goes as I squared....
Energy limiting fuses really do save the day. It is not really a cleanly switched rectangle of current of ten times the magntude for 100th of the time of course -that's just the mathematical equivalent energy.
The actual effect is much weirder; as the fuse starts to open it inserts a time dependent resistance, as the energy from the voltage dropped accross it is dissipated to create first the molten metal then vaporising it and then throwing it about, hopefully all the while staying inside that ceramic cylinder.
I really can't see why they need to put Im -= I delta m as you say is an RCD - so a plain Im would do.
The many alphabet soups that different makers use to describe the same thing does not always make things clearer.
Mike.
I really can't see why they need to put Im
Just thinking aloud... I guess the RCCB could be asked to break L-N currents that are larger than the residual current in a few circumstances - e.g. a bolted L-N-PE fault on a TT system. Hopefully in that situation the fault protection would open first, but maybe the thinking is that by specifying Im, the effects of L-N faults on the RCD have to be considered as well.
- Andy.
I really can't see why they need to put Im
Just thinking aloud... I guess the RCCB could be asked to break L-N currents that are larger than the residual current in a few circumstances - e.g. a bolted L-N-PE fault on a TT system. Hopefully in that situation the fault protection would open first, but maybe the thinking is that by specifying Im, the effects of L-N faults on the RCD have to be considered as well.
- Andy.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site