opinions of C2 code on satisfactory EICR

There was no spd at all and the cooker switch connections were still 2 turns loose with evidence of marks on the neutral and possibly cpc behind the switch.

So if there was no SPD at all. Then why was the observation given that there was no indication of functionality? After one was fitted by the person doing the eicr, and that one had no indication, then why did they fit it, knowing it would get a C3?

This before and after mash up leads to confusion. I don't particularly care if the certification bodies' inspectors think it is ok, it is not clear and understandable. If there needs to be a record of remedial works done on the day, I suggest it should be put in the "comments on the existing installation" box, and a clean, satisfactory report issued.

So if there was no SPD at all. Then why was the observation given that there was no indication of functionality? After one was fitted by the person doing the eicr, and that one had no indication, then why did they fit it, knowing it would get a C3?

This before and after mash up leads to confusion. I don't particularly care if the certification bodies' inspectors think it is ok, it is not clear and understandable. If there needs to be a record of remedial works done on the day, I suggest it should be put in the "comments on the existing installation" box, and a clean, satisfactory report issued.

There was no spd at the time of my audit visit,one was not fitted at all.