Calibration of Approved Voltage Indicators and Proving Units.

There was an old discussion on this 7 years ago but it is locked now. In any case there was no definitive answer provided at the time. In years gone by, I would have thought that AVIs and PUs either work or they dont.

But searching online today, Martindale recommend that their AVI's and PU's do need calibrating. This has prompted me to rethink and I note that in GS38 point 30 talks about all test equipment being maintained by a competent person and one of the common errors being failing to verify correct function of illumination (eg indicator/lamp/neon).

If something were to go wrong, and it turns out the AVI and PU were not calibrated within the last 12 months, I can imagine this wording above being used to attribute blame to the person who was undertaking the proving dead.

When we prove the AVI with the PU, we are putting voltage onto the AVI and simply seeing that the lamps light up, but the PU just puts out the max voltage it is capable of, it doesnt step up or down each voltage level individually, so we dont control the level it is proving at. 

What's other peoples thoughts? I am considering now that we do need to calibrate these items.

  • Have you got a fox problem too? :-0

  • Further 'proving dead' is not really a correct statement of what we are doing.

    Energy isolation?

  • There was a product recall on some of the Fluke T series testers made up to July 2018, because the leads may fail causing an intermittent fault, so they might work when you check them, but not whilst testing.

    That is a product issue, not a procedural issue ... surely, the product is designed with the procedure (intended use) in mind ?

    There was a product recall, so we are all aware of the issue ... is there an issue?

  • There was a product recall, so we are all aware of the issue ... is there an issue?

    Quote “T110, T130, and T150 T-Pole Testers shipped from Fluke after August 28th, 2018 and with serial numbers greater than those specified in the last column above are NOT impacted by this recall.”.

    So presumably the failure of the test lead sheath on this T110 made in 2021 is general wear and tear that should be identified as part of the regular user checks that should be part of the testing procedure, as the leads are deemed fit for purpose by the manufacturer?

    The test leads fail just inside the battery cover, so the battery cover needs to be removed to check the cable, in between replacing the batteries.