This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EICR and IR Testing

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Oh the bane of IR testing on EICRs

Now its just impracticle to disconnect all loads to carry out IR testing, I think everyone can agree on that. And that Phase and Neutral are connected then tested to earth.


This is what I do, and then test @250V as to avoid damaging any equipment in the installation. And unless the IR value was <.5 Meg, would not bother me. What BS7671 states, but BS7671 is maybe somewhat unclear in that if that voltage (250V) was used then .5meg value should used, but that value should only be used on SELV, and PELV. Now experience also tells me that even if you had a return 0.0, and then did Kohms by using the ohms setting, even values of 100Kohms are fine. (Actually can be much lower than this) and we are pretty clear that its not the cable reurning these values.


So question is when doing an EICR @ 250V, at what point would you recommend an FI? For me the value would have to be <.5Meg
  • I did another job last week around four miles away from your house which required me to go two days to do a first and second fix. The customer was a retired Post Office guy who worked at the international office and was telling me about the Post Office underground train and other bits of kit the PO used.


    Apparently the 1934 10th edition of the Wiring Regulations brought in a requirement for earthing, so that cable could be some of the first twin and earth or it could be three wire D.C. or A.C., there was also apparently a hell of a lot of variations in the electricity supply across London before the Second World War and it also seems there is still a hell of a lot of legacy installations still I use, some of which the customers still don’t want to rewire and want you to to tell them give sound insulation test results.


    Andy B.


  • Or to put it another way, just because you have achieved getting an insulation test result above 0.5 Mohms, it doesn’t mean that the installation isn’t a pile of doo doo.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Chris Pearson:
    Michael Moore:

    So question is when doing an EICR @ 250V, at what point would you recommend an FI? For me the value would have to be <.5Meg


    If lives together to earth are satisfactory, why do L-N at all?


    Was that ever suggested? and no I do not test P-N




     


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Not really a trap, I was trying to appease people on a facegroup group, and it was hurting, so needed some good professional answers, which I am getting here.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Sparkingchip:

    I went south of the river last Thursday to do what should have been a straightforward job, until I saw the cable that supplied the central heating system that I was planning to extend.


    You do have to appreciate just how bad the insulation is on some cables that are in use without tripping a RCD or MCB in a relatively new dual RCD consumer unit.


    cc3c406e19459a9746a2bb1eee2815e0-original-20200820_144553.jpg


    Goes to show that doing IR test dont realluy prove the safety of the install.


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Chris Pearson:
    John Peckham:

    Chris


    You have fallen in to the usual trap of not understanding the major difference between Initial Verification and Periodic Inspection and Testing.


    John, that's a bit unfair!


    My point was that for a periodic, L-N testing is unnecessary and as the OP said, practically impossible. How would you test a socket circuit with SRCD or USB where the manufacturer's instructions are that it should be disconnected when IR testing?


    As an aside, when testing at stages during erection, to start with the IR rapidly goes up to > 999 MΩ; but after a while it creeps up more slowly, especially when testing live to CPC. > 500 MΩ is certainly enough for me, but one could stop pressing the button as soon as it gets over 2 MΩ, or any value in between.




    As OP, Im doing EICRs, so witjhout being rude not interested Initial Verication, which of course is where the cables are most likely to get most damage. And With BS87671 stating that 1meg is aceppatble is a complete cop out IMO. 


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    John Peckham:

    Sorry Chris but fairness has never been one of my weaknesses.


    IR often creeps up if the IR test button is held down especially if the installation is large as with a good IR the installation acts like a capacitor with the DC from instrument charging the capacitor. 


    I would never IR test L/L on a periodic as you can never be sure everything electronic has been disconnected and I am not keen on a claim on my insurance.


    When doing periodic, and doing IR Testing L-N to E Im happy with 4 meg, and will note that on the test as global test. Just dont have the time or to start stripping the install down, and then, well actually nothing as everything is mnow above 200Meg


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    It rather depends what failure mode you are expecting, actually neither 230V nor 500V will 'jump' very far without assistance - much like a welding rod, contact has to be made either mechanically or by a signifiant over-voltage, and then an arc can be drawn out to a volume of hot gas limited only by the available power. Usually when this finally goes out the conductors have burnt back well beyond any re-striking distance. Equally for finding nails in the wire, trapped wires in backboxes or similar, a battery and bell set would probably do.

    I agree a 500V test will find a few things a 250V test will not, and a 1000V test will find a few more.

    In some ways the standard 500V test looks a bit feeble, given the overvoltage  categories defined in IEC 61010-1

    1500V for Cat I, (operation with protective low voltage), battery-operated devices, car electrics)

    2500V for Cat II  (household appliances, portable electrical appliances) and

    4000V for Cat III (loads with direct fixed connection, distribution, fixed installation appliances in the distribution system)


    Thanks for your answer, but was looking for testing LV in regards to BS7671, and at no point does that publication suggest using these values.
  • So what do you consider the minimum insulation value required is to be able to install RCD protection to an existing installation?


    Andy B.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Oh thats easy its 7.666Kohm

    0.008Megohm


    Which is what I alluded to on a Facebook group, and it completely baffled the bafoons there, who were apparently teachers!