Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 20 replies
  • Helpful Answers 1 Helpful answer
  • Subscribers 42 subscribers
  • Views 4743 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

18TH EDITION CORRIGENDUM

John Peckham

I see that the IET issued a press release on a forthcoming Corrigendum to the 18th Edition to be found here:

. 

Sounds interesting.

JP

  • 0

    "Indent (ii) of Regulation 443.4.1 has been removed. The term safety service, formerly included in Regulation 443.4.1 (ii), encompassed a wide range of systems. The provision, therefore, had unintended consequences for improvements to fire safety systems within installations."

    I think this has been brought up here in the past, it has certainly been brought up in various other groups I'm on, whereby people are fitting SPDs when fitting an additional smoke detector in a domestic house, some have gone as far as saying a SPD is required when swapping old heads for new.

  • 0

    Is this a way to introduce a 3rd amendment to the regs, without actually calling it an amendment?

  • 0 in reply to Simon Barker

    Evening Simon

    In short no. A corrigendum is used to correct errors and misunderstandings made in the current edition of the standard.

    JP

  • 0 in reply to Simon Barker

      is correct.

    Corrigenda are used to address errors inadvertently introduced during drafting or production of a standard that could lead to incorrect or unsafe application of the standard.

    So, spelling and punctuation mistakes won't usually be corrected in a Corrigendum, but wait until the next Amendment or Edition. Technical issues that require substantial changes would usually be an Amendment.

  • 0

    I did a quick internet search last night to check the difference between the possibilities when amending a document, they are perhaps actually not that important, as the outcome is generally the same, being it now says something different or doesn’t say anything at all.

    grammarist.com/.../

  • 0

    Last July I did the C&G EVSE course and set about reading the CoP before I went, it all went reasonably well until I got here.

  • 0 in reply to Sparkingchip

    The tutor didn’t mention the contents of those pages and I asked why?

    He laughed and said I should have checked the regs book.

  • 0 in reply to Sparkingchip

    Things go as well as being added.

  • 0

    There's also a FREE live announcement webinar with Q&A on 15th May if you want to sign up. 

  • 0

    The corrigendum was published this morning to see here. https://electrical.theiet.org/media/3027/bs-7671-2018-a2-2022-corrigendum-may-2023.pdf

    JP

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines